Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 22, 2019·United Center, Chicago

Colorado Avalanche 5, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11111139531
CHI016213115344

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:09COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Alexander Kerfoot, Sven Andrighetto · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:48CHIDylan StromePPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:05COLJ.T. CompherPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:31CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:36COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: J.T. Compher · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:00CHIAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Jonathan Toews · Backhand, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:38COLJ.T. CompherGWGAssists: Patrik Nemeth · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:26COLCarl SoderbergENAssists: Matt Calvert, Patrik Nemeth · Wrist, 0.75 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:15CHIConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:14CHIChris Kunitz: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:41CHIErik Gustafsson: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 9:30COLTyson Barrie: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:45CHISlater Koekkoek: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 6:41COLTyson Jost: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 9:32COLMikko Rantanen: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 18:17COLErik Johnson: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLCHI
31Shots on goal44
3.2Expected goals4.2
47Shot attempts73
29Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
31Hits19
23Blocked shots12
11Giveaways10
12Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – MacKinnon – Rantanen5:51

    xG 0.41–0.26 (61%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Soderberg – Landeskog – Compher4:19

    xG 0.27–0.18 (60%)attempts 3–5goals 2–0

  3. Soderberg – Nieto – Rantanen5:45

    xG 0.25–0.18 (59%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Calvert – Landeskog – Jost4:25

    xG 0.20–0.17 (54%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Graves2:35

    xG 0.27–0.08 (76%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Nemeth – Zadorov7:38

    xG 0.12–0.16 (42%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Zadorov4:35

    xG 0.16–0.22 (42%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Kane – Caggiula14:35

    xG 0.98–0.58 (63%)attempts 16–11goals 1–2

  2. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat2:44

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Strome – DeBrincat – Kahun9:14

    xG 0.56–0.51 (52%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  4. Kunitz – Kruger – Hayden2:36

    xG 0.00–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Gustafsson17:12

    xG 1.08–0.66 (62%)attempts 20–14goals 1–1

  2. Murphy – Koekkoek4:43

    xG 0.31–0.13 (71%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Koekkoek – Jokiharju6:10

    xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.2 xGCOL 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHICOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #132 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.30 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).