Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 23, 2019·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 5, Nashville Predators 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL1521026521
NSH010010018038

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:05COLNathan MacKinnonGWGAssists: Nikita Zadorov, Alexander Kerfoot · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 14:41COLAlexander KerfootPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–0
  3. P2 18:02COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Samuel Girard, Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–0
  4. P3 9:59COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Alexander Kerfoot · Slap, 0.09 xG4–0
  5. P3 16:42COLNikita ZadorovAssists: Sven Andrighetto, Carl Soderberg · Slap, 0.03 xG5–0
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 7:19NSHRoman Josi: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 10:40COLNikita Zadorov: Holding2 min
  3. P1 19:33NSHRyan Ellis: Interference2 min
  4. P2 4:05COLSven Andrighetto: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 10:51COLRyan Graves: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 13:23NSHDan Hamhuis: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P2 16:31NSHYannick Weber: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 16:31COLSheldon Dries: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 5:14COLGabriel Landeskog: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 8:04NSHMattias Ekholm: Boarding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 9:44COLSven Andrighetto: Embellishment2 min
  12. P3 9:44NSHYannick Weber: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 11:53COLMatt Calvert: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 12:14NSHBrian Boyle: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
21Shots on goal38
2.2Expected goals3.3
34Shot attempts74
23Faceoffs won34
5Power plays5
14Penalty minutes14
17Hits13
19Blocked shots5
6Giveaways7
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Agozzino – Greer – Dries7:04

    xG 0.05–0.10 (33%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  2. Soderberg – Andrighetto – Compher6:06

    xG 0.24–0.38 (39%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  3. Calvert – Landeskog – Jost8:58

    xG 0.17–0.35 (33%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Kerfoot – MacKinnon – Rantanen10:15

    xG 0.06–0.74 (7%)attempts 3–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Barrie – Girard2:08

    xG 0.02–0.02 (50%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Graves6:58

    xG 0.09–0.19 (32%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Girard13:01

    xG 0.31–0.59 (35%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson4:15

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Bonino – Grimaldi – Fiala2:06

    xG 0.22–0.05 (83%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Fiala6:11

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  4. Boyle – Bonino – Hartman5:11

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm11:20

    xG 0.84–0.03 (97%)attempts 21–1goals 0–1

  2. Ellis – Ekholm2:55

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Weber4:01

    xG 0.10–0.02 (86%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.3 xGCOL 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 8/100 · #1150 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 68% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).