Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 5, 2019·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Minnesota Wild 4, Nashville Predators 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN11216214010433
NSH191828001525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:48NSHCraig SmithAssists: Rocco Grimaldi, Matt Donovan · Snap, 0.28 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:25MINKevin FialaAssists: Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:38NSHBrian BoylePPAssists: P.K. Subban, Viktor Arvidsson · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:49MINPontus AbergAssists: Jordan Greenway, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:25MINEric FehrAssists: Marcus Foligno · Snap, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:59NSHRoman JosiAssists: Ryan Ellis, Rocco Grimaldi · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:21NSHViktor ArvidssonUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:42MINKevin FialaAssists: Zach Parise, Eric Staal · Snap, 0.06 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Kyle Turris stopped
  2. 2. MIN Kevin Fiala stopped
  3. 3. NSH Ryan Ellis stopped
  4. 4. MIN Pontus Aberg stopped
  5. 5. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  6. 6. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  7. 7. NSH Ryan Johansen scored
  8. 8. MIN Ryan Donato stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 18:29NSHRyan Johansen: Interference2 min
  2. P2 12:26MINJason Zucker: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 18:29NSHMatt Irwin: Holding2 min
  4. P3 12:29NSHRyan Johansen: Interference2 min
  5. OT 2:11NSHMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Turris
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNSH
33Shots on goal25
2.9Expected goals2.2
60Shot attempts53
26Faceoffs won31
4Power plays1
2Penalty minutes8
14Hits20
14Blocked shots16
13Giveaways17
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFehr – Foligno – Brown8:19

    xG 0.43–0.10 (82%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Aberg – Donato – Eriksson Ek5:53

    xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Aberg – Greenway – Eriksson Ek4:02

    xG 0.39–0.17 (70%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

  4. Staal – Zucker – Donato6:29

    xG 0.17–0.43 (28%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon22:41

    xG 0.97–0.25 (80%)attempts 17–14goals 1–0

  2. Pateryn – Brodin14:47

    xG 0.55–0.67 (45%)attempts 13–23goals 2–1

  3. Bitetto – Hunt9:53

    xG 0.51–0.75 (40%)attempts 10–8goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson14:11

    xG 0.85–0.62 (58%)attempts 19–11goals 0–1

  2. Boyle – Jarnkrok – Sissons7:32

    xG 0.22–0.06 (80%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  3. Smith – Granlund – Sissons4:11

    xG 0.05–0.02 (70%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Simmonds – Grimaldi7:45

    xG 0.47–0.44 (51%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Subban – Ekholm21:16

    xG 0.95–0.98 (49%)attempts 24–19goals 0–2

  2. Josi – Ellis17:52

    xG 0.67–0.73 (48%)attempts 18–14goals 2–0

  3. Donovan – Irwin10:49

    xG 0.42–0.74 (36%)attempts 7–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.2 xGMIN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #50 of 1271 this seasonSwing 3.04 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

NSH winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).