Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 15, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Anaheim Ducks 5, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA011312214537
COL216013115344

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:54COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: J.T. Compher, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:10COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Nathan MacKinnon · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:08ANACorey PerryAssists: Cam Fowler, Adam Henrique · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:23ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Daniel Sprong, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:40ANADaniel SprongAssists: Jaycob Megna, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:42COLSven AndrighettoAssists: Ian Cole, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:03ANACorey PerryPPGWGAssists: Nick Ritchie, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.29 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:37ANAHampus LindholmENAssists: Josh Manson · Wrist, 0.42 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:49ANARyan Getzlaf: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:19ANANick Ritchie: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:19COLMatt Calvert: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 8:36COLPatrik Nemeth: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 3:21ANACarter Rowney: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 10:09ANARyan Getzlaf: Interference2 min
  7. P3 17:39COLMikko Rantanen: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Soderberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACOL
37Shots on goal44
2.6Expected goals3.2
57Shot attempts65
25Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
36Hits31
15Blocked shots12
4Giveaways7
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Ritchie – Sprong7:37

    xG 0.76–0.34 (69%)attempts 12–6goals 2–1

  2. Perry – Henrique – Terry10:21

    xG 0.33–0.53 (38%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  3. Silfverberg – Rakell – Shore10:33

    xG 0.23–0.50 (31%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  4. Grant – Rowney – Jones8:03

    xG 0.02–0.56 (4%)attempts 3–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolzer – Megna9:10

    xG 0.64–0.48 (57%)attempts 7–12goals 1–1

  2. Manson – Lindholm18:19

    xG 0.39–0.82 (32%)attempts 22–14goals 0–1

  3. Fowler – Larsson17:23

    xG 0.54–1.11 (33%)attempts 15–21goals 2–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestBrassard – Compher – MacKinnon11:55

    xG 0.66–0.20 (77%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  2. Calvert – Kerfoot – Jost9:18

    xG 0.29–0.15 (67%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  3. Bourque – Agozzino – Andrighetto4:43

    xG 0.25–0.14 (64%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Soderberg – Wilson – Rantanen8:50

    xG 0.37–0.60 (38%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Nemeth2:30

    xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Barrie – Zadorov3:25

    xG 0.31–0.13 (71%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Nemeth – Zadorov9:09

    xG 0.35–0.18 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGANA 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #166 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).