Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 5, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 2, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN11118012231
COL2151918432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:30COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:57COLPierre-Edouard BellemareAssists: Matt Calvert, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 10:17MINRyan SuterUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:31MINZach ParisePPAssists: Mathew Dumba, Ryan Suter · Deflected, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:54COLGabriel LandeskogGWGAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:20COLRyan GravesENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.44 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:07MINMats Zuccarello: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:02COLTyson Jost: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  3. P1 19:09COLTyson Jost: Interference2 min
  4. P2 2:10MINLuke Kunin: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 5:17MINMathew Dumba: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 6:54COLAndre Burakovsky: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 12:21COLRyan Graves: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 15:18MINMikko Koivu: Interference2 min
  9. P3 4:22MINLuke Kunin: Interference2 min
  10. P3 12:10MINJonas Brodin: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bellemare won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
31Shots on goal32
2.0Expected goals2.8
50Shot attempts56
32Faceoffs won27
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
31Hits27
14Blocked shots12
5Giveaways4
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Parise – Greenway – Kunin8:49

    xG 0.52–0.48 (52%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Hartman – Eriksson Ek8:17

    xG 0.22–0.27 (45%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Koivu – Zucker – Fiala6:55

    xG 0.32–0.37 (46%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  4. Staal – Zuccarello – Donato7:39

    xG 0.17–0.36 (32%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunt – Soucy11:06

    xG 0.16–0.08 (65%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Dumba14:38

    xG 0.91–1.05 (46%)attempts 17–19goals 1–1

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin11:03

    xG 0.28–0.42 (40%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCalvert – Nichushkin – Bellemare4:34

    xG 0.54–0.15 (78%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

  2. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:09

    xG 0.47–0.21 (69%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Nieto – Burakovsky – Compher5:46

    xG 0.18–0.29 (38%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Donskoi – Jost5:22

    xG 0.21–0.63 (25%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGraves – Timmins8:47

    xG 0.85–0.31 (73%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Johnson – Girard10:17

    xG 0.42–0.30 (58%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

  3. Girard – Makar2:29

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.8 xGMIN 2.0 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #390 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).