Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 22, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

San Jose Sharks 3, Buffalo Sabres 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS2100511300328
BUF0142101411429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:46SJSDylan GambrellAssists: Erik Karlsson, Marcus Sorensen · Deflected, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:23SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: Patrick Marleau, Timo Meier · Snap, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:21BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Victor Olofsson · Slap, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:29BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jack Eichel · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 0:45BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jack Eichel, Henri Jokiharju · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:27SJSErik KarlssonAssists: Kevin Labanc, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:13BUFJack EichelGWGAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Casey Mittelstadt · Backhand, 0.28 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 10:46SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:10SJSBarclay Goodrow: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 10:43SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 14:02BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 6:22BUFJack Eichel: Interference2 min
  6. P3 9:07SJSBarclay Goodrow: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBUF
28Shots on goal29
2.3Expected goals3.9
47Shot attempts43
25Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
12Hits21
6Blocked shots11
6Giveaways5
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestSorensen – Karlsson – Gambrell4:24

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  2. Kane – Hertl – Labanc2:48

    xG 0.25–0.09 (72%)attempts 5–1goals 0–1

  3. Marleau – Couture – Meier12:03

    xG 0.48–0.52 (48%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Hertl – Gregor8:58

    xG 0.23–0.34 (40%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Dillon15:58

    xG 0.75–0.46 (62%)attempts 18–6goals 2–0

  2. Burns – Vlasic16:24

    xG 0.90–0.74 (55%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  3. Heed – Ferraro8:20

    xG 0.36–0.45 (44%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Vesey – Sheary – Mittelstadt6:57

    xG 0.33–0.28 (54%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Sobotka – Johansson – Skinner10:34

    xG 0.55–0.52 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons8:13

    xG 0.36–0.40 (47%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

  4. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel12:35

    xG 0.33–0.45 (43%)attempts 7–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Jokiharju12:22

    xG 0.71–0.50 (59%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen15:54

    xG 0.30–0.77 (28%)attempts 8–14goals 0–2

  3. Miller – Dahlin12:01

    xG 0.19–0.72 (21%)attempts 2–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.9 xGSJS 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #118 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 74% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).