Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 30, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Colorado Avalanche 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11216111329
COL31141305729

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:37CHIBrandon SaadSHAssists: Zack Smith · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:53COLNazem KadriPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:18COLNazem KadriAssists: Matt Nieto, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P1 11:08COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Joonas Donskoi · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 2:52COLJoonas DonskoiGWGAssists: Ryan Graves, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–4
  6. P2 5:50COLMikko RantanenAssists: Samuel Girard, Joonas Donskoi · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–5
  7. P2 8:28COLJoonas DonskoiAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–6
  8. P2 10:38COLTyson JostAssists: T.J. Tynan · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–7
  9. P2 11:14CHIDominik KubalikAssists: David Kampf, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–7
  10. P3 14:38CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:26CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 7:22CHIAnton Wedin: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 17:23COLSamuel Girard: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:23CHIAlex DeBrincat: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:35COLTyson Jost: Holding2 min
  6. P1 18:37COLRyan Graves: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P2 14:24CHIErik Gustafsson: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 2:35COLCalle Rosen: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 9:32CHIAndrew Shaw: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 13:05COLVladislav Kamenev: Interference2 min · PPG
  11. P3 13:29COLPierre-Edouard Bellemare: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICOL
29Shots on goal29
2.9Expected goals2.2
57Shot attempts41
28Faceoffs won35
6Power plays4
13Penalty minutes17
17Hits16
6Blocked shots18
5Giveaways4
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. Kane – Carpenter – DeBrincat9:42

    xG 0.44–0.41 (51%)attempts 15–9goals 0–2

  2. Kubalik – Kampf – Wedin7:44

    xG 0.11–0.13 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. Toews – Shaw – Saad8:41

    xG 0.27–0.46 (37%)attempts 5–8goals 0–2

  4. Smith – Nylander – Dach7:32

    xG 0.06–0.26 (18%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Seabrook – de Haan11:41

    xG 0.35–0.41 (46%)attempts 17–7goals 0–2

  2. Koekkoek – Gustafsson12:38

    xG 0.14–0.30 (31%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  3. Murphy – Maatta13:56

    xG 0.44–0.76 (36%)attempts 8–16goals 1–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Nieto – Compher7:45

    xG 0.31–0.08 (79%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Donskoi – MacKinnon – Rantanen7:31

    xG 0.60–0.40 (60%)attempts 9–6goals 3–0

  3. Tynan – Kamenev – Jost8:49

    xG 0.24–0.06 (80%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  4. Nichushkin – Bellemare – O'Connor7:25

    xG 0.17–0.04 (82%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Rosen10:23

    xG 0.42–0.23 (65%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

  2. Zadorov – Girard10:28

    xG 0.33–0.22 (60%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Graves – Makar8:46

    xG 0.35–0.30 (54%)attempts 7–5goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.2 xGCHI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #341 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.92 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 64% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).