Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 19, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Minnesota Wild 8, Arizona Coyotes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN07413413833
ARI117112311540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:14ARIPhil KesselAssists: Taylor Hall, Christian Dvorak · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:00MINRyan DonatoAssists: Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:25MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Carson Soucy, Victor Rask · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:46ARIJakob ChychrunPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:11MINRyan HartmanAssists: Marcus Foligno, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:15MINEric StaalAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Brad Hunt · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–2
  7. P3 0:48ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonUnassisted · Slap, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 3:22ARIJakob ChychrunPPAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–4
  9. P3 4:22MINBrad HuntAssists: Jordan Greenway, Nico Sturm · Wrist, 0.09 xG5–4
  10. P3 4:57MINMats ZuccarelloGWGAssists: Eric Staal, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.15 xG6–4
  11. P3 5:23ARIClayton KellerAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG6–5
  12. P3 11:16MINRyan SuterAssists: Marcus Foligno, Ryan Hartman · Backhand, 0.17 xG7–5
  13. P3 19:51MINLuke KuninENAssists: Zach Parise, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.66 xG8–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:42ARIChristian Fischer: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 3:21MINBrad Hunt: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 10:58ARITaylor Hall: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 10:58MINCarson Soucy: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 5:17ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Holding2 min
  6. P2 8:15MINCarson Soucy: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:43MINKevin Fiala: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 2:23MINVictor Rask: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  9. P3 7:58MINEric Staal: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 7:58ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Embellishment2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Sturm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINARI
33Shots on goal40
3.7Expected goals3.2
52Shot attempts79
27Faceoffs won41
2Power plays4
12Penalty minutes8
22Hits20
22Blocked shots10
9Giveaways5
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Rask – Hartman11:12

    xG 0.73–0.32 (69%)attempts 12–13goals 3–1

  2. Staal – Parise – Zuccarello11:23

    xG 0.73–0.39 (65%)attempts 11–13goals 2–0

  3. Greenway – Kunin – Sturm8:03

    xG 0.17–0.12 (60%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  4. Johnson – Fiala – Donato5:45

    xG 0.00–0.44 (1%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon15:05

    xG 0.91–0.58 (61%)attempts 17–23goals 3–2

  2. Brodin – Soucy14:44

    xG 1.08–0.83 (57%)attempts 10–20goals 1–0

  3. Hunt – Dumba10:51

    xG 0.55–0.37 (60%)attempts 8–8goals 2–1

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Hall – Dvorak11:19

    xG 0.98–0.25 (80%)attempts 19–7goals 1–0

  2. Stepan – Hinostroza – Crouse10:03

    xG 0.17–0.39 (30%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  3. Soderberg – Schmaltz – Keller7:42

    xG 0.26–0.95 (22%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1

  4. Richardson – Grabner – Fischer8:04

    xG 0.09–0.92 (8%)attempts 3–12goals 0–4

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Lyubushkin7:38

    xG 0.23–0.02 (90%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Chychrun15:01

    xG 0.83–0.91 (48%)attempts 22–13goals 0–2

  3. Ness – Oesterle4:11

    xG 0.08–0.26 (23%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.2 xGMIN 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #17 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.64 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).