Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 21, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI06115411532
COL11221009331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:01COLRyan GravesAssists: Joonas Donskoi, Tyson Jost · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:21CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:40COLMatt CalvertAssists: Tyson Jost, Ryan Graves · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:09COLMatt CalvertAssists: Valeri Nichushkin, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 11:22CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Dominik Kubalik, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:50CHIKirby DachAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Ryan Carpenter · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:43CHIDominik KubalikGWGAssists: Jonathan Toews, Dennis Gilbert · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:21CHIConnor MurphyENAssists: David Kampf · Wrist, 0.44 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:47CHIOlli Maatta: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 5:40COLRyan Graves: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 8:30COLGabriel Landeskog: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 8:30CHIDennis Gilbert: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 12:34COLErik Johnson: Holding2 min
  6. P2 15:41CHIMatthew Highmore: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 7:59CHIDennis Gilbert: Holding2 min
  8. P3 12:07COLMikko Rantanen: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICOL
32Shots on goal31
2.1Expected goals2.1
61Shot attempts53
28Faceoffs won22
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
21Hits27
16Blocked shots20
4Giveaways10
11Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Kane – Kubalik6:07

    xG 0.31–0.12 (73%)attempts 8–5goals 3–0

  2. Carpenter – DeBrincat – Dach8:40

    xG 0.12–0.02 (85%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  3. Smith – Highmore – Kampf8:22

    xG 0.15–0.26 (37%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  4. Toews – Kubalik – Sikura3:42

    xG 0.03–0.15 (18%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Gustafsson12:11

    xG 0.27–0.14 (65%)attempts 14–7goals 2–0

  2. Keith – Murphy2:23

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Gilbert2:05

    xG 0.10–0.07 (60%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCalvert – Nichushkin – Bellemare7:45

    xG 0.42–0.11 (79%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Kadri – Donskoi – Burakovsky9:23

    xG 0.24–0.17 (58%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Nieto – Compher – Jost3:20

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen10:39

    xG 0.39–0.38 (50%)attempts 13–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Graves13:37

    xG 0.74–0.23 (76%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1

  2. Zadorov – Girard14:05

    xG 0.56–0.48 (54%)attempts 15–12goals 0–2

  3. Johnson – Zadorov2:58

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.1 xGCHI 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #172 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).