Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 27, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 6, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN21311139633
COL215114115444

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:33MINCarson SoucyAssists: Jordan Greenway, Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:22MINEric StaalAssists: Kevin Fiala, Zach Parise · Tip-in, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:24COLMatt CalvertAssists: Ian Cole, Pierre-Edouard Bellemare · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:10COLGabriel LandeskogUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:18MINBrad HuntPPAssists: Mathew Dumba, Luke Kunin · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:12COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Cale Makar, Mikko Rantanen · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:33COLMatt CalvertAssists: Pierre-Edouard Bellemare, Valeri Nichushkin · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:41MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Jonas Brodin, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.38 xG4–4
  9. P3 11:58MINVictor RaskGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.03 xG5–4
  10. P3 18:48MINRyan SuterENAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.50 xG6–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 15:11MINCarson Soucy: Interference2 min
  2. P2 1:10COLRyan Graves: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 9:39COLSamuel Girard: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P3 4:20MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Holding2 min
  5. P3 18:44MINRyan Hartman: Holding2 min
  6. P3 18:44COLNazem Kadri: Embellishment2 min
  7. P3 18:44COLNazem Kadri: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sturm won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
33Shots on goal44
3.1Expected goals3.9
51Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won33
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes16
21Hits22
10Blocked shots12
1Giveaways4
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Parise – Zuccarello11:20

    xG 1.00–0.38 (72%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Foligno – Rask – Hartman8:29

    xG 0.41–0.08 (83%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  3. Greenway – Kunin – Sturm12:37

    xG 0.17–0.36 (33%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  4. Fiala – Donato – Eriksson Ek9:23

    xG 0.19–0.67 (22%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunt – Dumba13:38

    xG 0.96–0.38 (72%)attempts 14–9goals 2–1

  2. Brodin – Soucy15:27

    xG 0.68–0.64 (51%)attempts 16–13goals 2–2

  3. Suter – Spurgeon17:58

    xG 0.69–0.73 (49%)attempts 14–20goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen15:53

    xG 0.74–0.62 (55%)attempts 18–13goals 1–2

  2. Calvert – Nichushkin – Bellemare7:07

    xG 0.21–0.37 (36%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Kadri – Donskoi – Burakovsky10:08

    xG 0.33–0.63 (34%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Nieto – Compher – Jost7:58

    xG 0.16–0.68 (19%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Girard2:41

    xG 0.49–0.05 (90%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Graves12:54

    xG 0.66–0.31 (68%)attempts 15–10goals 1–1

  3. Graves – Makar3:10

    xG 0.35–0.14 (71%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.9 xGMIN 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #33 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.52 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).