Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 14, 2020·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Minnesota Wild 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN01011128329
PIT2821239729

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:57PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Backhand, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:57PITJared McCannAssists: Dominik Simon, John Marino · Wrist, 0.27 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:04PITBryan RustAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Dominik Kahun · Snap, 0.15 xG0–3
  4. P2 15:05PITEvgeni MalkinPPGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P2 17:17MINZach PariseAssists: Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 2:15MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Luke Kunin · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:41PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Jared McCann · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:20PITDominik SimonAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–6
  9. P3 16:57PITAlex GalchenyukAssists: Andrew Agozzino, Patric Hornqvist · Snap, 0.11 xG2–7
  10. P3 19:47MINZach ParisePPUnassisted · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:28MINMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:09MINKevin Fiala: Holding2 min
  3. P1 13:44PITAndrew Agozzino: Interference2 min
  4. P1 19:30MINMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 14:18MINMats Zuccarello: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 17:50PITJared McCann: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPIT
29Shots on goal29
2.1Expected goals3.7
43Shot attempts47
27Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
25Hits25
4Blocked shots8
11Giveaways13
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Zuccarello – Zucker11:55

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Eriksson Ek – Kunin11:59

    xG 0.34–0.36 (48%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  3. Koivu – Parise – Fiala9:29

    xG 0.31–0.54 (37%)attempts 6–10goals 1–1

  4. Rask – Hartman – Greenway8:24

    xG 0.21–1.12 (16%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Suter – Spurgeon6:37

    xG 0.28–0.23 (55%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Spurgeon – Soucy10:48

    xG 0.27–0.23 (54%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba12:30

    xG 0.22–0.18 (55%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Rust – Kahun10:45

    xG 0.67–0.19 (78%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – McCann – Simon10:57

    xG 0.57–0.25 (70%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  3. Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese13:04

    xG 0.18–0.53 (26%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Hornqvist – Agozzino – Galchenyuk7:47

    xG 0.13–0.49 (21%)attempts 2–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Letang16:21

    xG 0.89–0.71 (55%)attempts 13–15goals 3–1

  2. Pettersson – Marino15:16

    xG 0.39–0.46 (46%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Ruhwedel – Riikola11:52

    xG 0.09–0.26 (27%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.7 xGMIN 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #345 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).