Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 18, 2020·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Arizona Coyotes 3, Edmonton Oilers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI07211112330
EDM3831019727

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:56EDMJosh ArchibaldSHAssists: Riley Sheahan, Kris Russell · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:02EDMSam GagnerAssists: Riley Sheahan · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:06EDMKailer YamamotoAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Snap, 0.31 xG0–3
  4. P2 1:00EDMConnor McDavidPPGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–4
  5. P2 4:49EDMJoakim NygardAssists: Riley Sheahan · Snap, 0.08 xG0–5
  6. P2 5:20ARITaylor HallAssists: Conor Garland, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–5
  7. P2 9:13ARIChristian DvorakPPAssists: Conor Garland, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–5
  8. P2 16:06EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Josh Archibald, James Neal · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–6
  9. P3 11:12ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Clayton Keller, Carl Soderberg · Snap, 0.05 xG3–6
  10. P3 16:14EDMRiley SheahanENAssists: Josh Archibald · Snap, 0.60 xG3–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:30EDMSam Gagner: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 11:37ARIPhil Kessel: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 19:43ARIConor Garland: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P2 8:19EDMConnor McDavid: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:35ARIDerek Stepan: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 17:25EDMAdam Larsson: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 18:17ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 9:56EDMAdam Larsson: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← ARI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Dvorak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIEDM
30Shots on goal27
2.3Expected goals3.9
50Shot attempts52
27Faceoffs won35
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
18Hits21
15Blocked shots14
7Giveaways10
9Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Stepan – Crouse9:45

    xG 0.43–0.05 (89%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Chaput – Hinostroza – Keller2:01

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Dvorak – Garland10:14

    xG 0.54–0.54 (50%)attempts 12–9goals 1–2

  4. Soderberg – Grabner – Schmaltz2:35

    xG 0.10–0.27 (27%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkman-Larsson – Chychrun2:08

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Capobianco5:20

    xG 0.25–0.12 (68%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Hjalmarsson6:16

    xG 0.14–0.04 (79%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl – Yamamoto11:44

    xG 0.91–0.42 (69%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Neal – Archibald – McDavid9:54

    xG 0.63–0.45 (58%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  3. Gagner – Chiasson – Haas8:51

    xG 0.16–0.18 (46%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

  4. Sheahan – Russell – Nygard9:32

    xG 0.10–0.30 (25%)attempts 2–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Bear17:07

    xG 1.10–0.66 (62%)attempts 22–16goals 3–0

  2. Larsson – Klefbom12:23

    xG 0.86–0.55 (61%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Russell – Jones13:05

    xG 0.34–0.36 (48%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.9 xGARI 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #418 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

EDM winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).