Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 2, 2020·Capital One Arena, Washington

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Washington Capitals 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT21211615433
WSH11009213332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:38WSHLars EllerAssists: Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:46PITSam LaffertyAssists: Alex Galchenyuk · Snap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:40PITPatric HornqvistAssists: John Marino, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:59PITDominik SimonAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jared McCann · Backhand, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:00WSHEvgeny KuznetsovAssists: Jakub Vrana, Nick Jensen · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:27PITBrandon TanevGWGAssists: Teddy Blueger, Zachary Aston-Reese · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:42WSHLars EllerAssists: Carl Hagelin, Radko Gudas · Snap, 0.11 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:35WSHAlex Ovechkin: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 4:09PITJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 4:09WSHGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 5:42PITJohn Marino: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 8:18WSHLars Eller: Interference2 min
  6. P1 17:05PITDominik Simon: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P2 3:17WSHJonas Siegenthaler: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 13:27PITSidney Crosby: Interference2 min
  9. P2 15:43WSHBrendan Leipsic: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 0:17PITKris Letang: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 0:17WSHTom Wilson: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 1:54WSHDmitry Orlov: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 10:41WSHCarl Hagelin: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITWSH
33Shots on goal32
3.6Expected goals2.6
49Shot attempts73
34Faceoffs won30
6Power plays3
10Penalty minutes16
24Hits47
22Blocked shots10
13Giveaways13
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Rust8:46

    xG 0.36–0.27 (58%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

  2. Galchenyuk – Lafferty – Angello5:01

    xG 0.56–0.51 (52%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

  3. Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese7:46

    xG 0.14–0.23 (37%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – McCann – Simon9:43

    xG 0.38–0.54 (42%)attempts 9–16goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Ruhwedel5:19

    xG 0.16–0.21 (44%)attempts 2–6goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Marino7:38

    xG 0.21–0.30 (41%)attempts 8–12goals 2–0

  3. Ruhwedel – Pettersson2:19

    xG 0.01–0.15 (9%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestDowd – Leipsic – Hathaway3:05

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Ovechkin – Oshie – Backstrom2:25

    xG 0.20–0.02 (93%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Hagelin – Eller – Panik6:18

    xG 0.33–0.37 (47%)attempts 10–5goals 2–1

  4. Oshie – Kuznetsov – Vrana8:48

    xG 0.50–0.56 (47%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Kempny3:22

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 1–0

  2. Carlson – Orlov5:11

    xG 0.38–0.04 (91%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Orlov – Jensen7:43

    xG 0.54–0.42 (56%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.6 xGPIT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #495 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.44 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).