Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 15, 2020·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI08110215333
TBL2111627524

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:17TBLAlex KillornAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:55TBLCedric PaquetteAssists: Tyler Johnson, Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:35TBLCarter VerhaegheAssists: Victor Hedman, Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 8:57PHIIvan ProvorovPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Sean Couturier · Slap, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:34TBLBrayden PointGWGAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P3 15:31PHIJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Matt Niskanen, Travis Sanheim · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:15PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Ivan Provorov, Travis Konecny · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:38TBLNikita KucherovENAssists: Steven Stamkos, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.64 xG3–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 5:37TBLMitchell Stephens: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 7:53PHIIvan Provorov: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 7:53TBLNikita Kucherov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:36PHIMichael Raffl: Elbowing2 min
  5. P2 13:09TBLYanni Gourde: Interference2 min
  6. P2 13:51PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 13:51TBLSteven Stamkos: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:51PHIClaude Giroux: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 17:12PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 0:00TBLBraydon Coburn: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 0:00PHIJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 0:00TBLErik Cernak: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 0:46PHIIvan Provorov: Boarding2 min
  14. P3 5:01TBLBraydon Coburn: Holding2 min
  15. P3 14:00TBLMitchell Stephens: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHITBL
33Shots on goal24
2.5Expected goals3.2
46Shot attempts46
27Faceoffs won41
5Power plays5
14Penalty minutes24
21Hits29
10Blocked shots6
3Giveaways4
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Couturier9:40

    xG 0.41–0.32 (56%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  2. Hayes – Konecny – Farabee8:25

    xG 0.32–0.34 (48%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Pitlick – Laughton7:12

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 4–6goals 0–2

  4. Raffl – Aube-Kubel – Bunnaman6:02

    xG 0.13–0.41 (24%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Sanheim – Myers12:29

    xG 0.34–0.45 (43%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  2. Provorov – Myers2:26

    xG 0.01–0.13 (10%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

  3. Niskanen – Provorov9:58

    xG 0.21–0.38 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 0–2

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGourde – Verhaeghe – Stephens6:29

    xG 0.62–0.22 (74%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Stamkos – Kucherov – Point10:04

    xG 0.40–0.14 (74%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Maroon – Johnson – Paquette8:10

    xG 0.38–0.41 (48%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Palat – Cirelli9:26

    xG 0.26–0.44 (37%)attempts 4–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Sergachev10:59

    xG 0.57–0.19 (75%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  2. Coburn – Schenn7:07

    xG 0.36–0.10 (78%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Cernak11:05

    xG 0.69–0.46 (60%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.2 xGPHI 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #260 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.90 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).