Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 17, 2020·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Anaheim Ducks 4, Calgary Flames 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 87% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA010210210430
CGY012118513643

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:53ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Troy Terry, Nick Ritchie · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:46CGYAndrew MangiapaneAssists: Noah Hanifin, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:37ANAJakob SilfverbergUnassisted · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:05ANANicolas DeslauriersAssists: Carter Rowney · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 4:46CGYAndrew MangiapaneUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:05CGYSam BennettAssists: Michael Stone · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:59CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Andrew Mangiapane, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–4
  8. P3 14:03CGYSean MonahanGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:03CGYAndrew MangiapaneENAssists: Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.67 xG3–6
  10. P3 19:56ANADevin ShoreAssists: Jacob Larsson, Jakob Silfverberg · Tip-in, 0.04 xG4–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 10:33ANABrendan Guhle: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 14:51CGYAndrew Mangiapane: Interference2 min
  3. P2 12:44ANANick Ritchie: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 18:30ANANicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 1:00CGYMilan Lucic: Holding2 min
  6. P3 14:26ANASam Steel: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Grant won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACGY
30Shots on goal43
2.8Expected goals5.7
45Shot attempts71
32Faceoffs won32
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
13Hits20
10Blocked shots3
12Giveaways14
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSilfverberg – Shore – Steel9:02

    xG 0.51–0.35 (59%)attempts 12–5goals 2–1

  2. Grant – Deslauriers – Rowney6:43

    xG 0.05–0.43 (11%)attempts 3–5goals 1–1

  3. Henrique – Ritchie – Terry10:12

    xG 0.68–1.20 (36%)attempts 12–14goals 1–1

  4. Getzlaf – Rakell – Jones10:27

    xG 0.36–1.07 (25%)attempts 6–15goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Holzer – Larsson10:34

    xG 0.64–0.67 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 2–1

  2. Fowler – Guhle13:16

    xG 0.84–1.39 (38%)attempts 12–19goals 1–2

  3. Manson – Lindholm16:14

    xG 0.34–1.47 (19%)attempts 10–20goals 1–2

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Mangiapane – Tkachuk13:23

    xG 2.00–0.15 (93%)attempts 24–5goals 3–0

  2. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan11:25

    xG 1.05–0.57 (65%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  3. Rinaldo – Rieder – Jankowski5:39

    xG 0.27–0.06 (81%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

  4. Lucic – Bennett – Dube9:12

    xG 0.45–0.88 (34%)attempts 7–10goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestStone – Brodie15:13

    xG 0.91–0.29 (76%)attempts 19–7goals 1–2

  2. Kylington – Yelesin9:40

    xG 0.69–0.28 (71%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  3. Hanifin – Andersson13:15

    xG 1.24–1.09 (53%)attempts 17–14goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 5.7 xGANA 2.8 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #73 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.08 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 87% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).