Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 23, 2021·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Tampa Bay Lightning 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL21401008232
CBJ3908211528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:10TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Mitchell Stephens, Alexander Volkov · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:27CBJNick FolignoAssists: Cam Atkinson, Michael Del Zotto · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:03CBJMikhail GrigorenkoAssists: Kevin Stenlund, Nathan Gerbe · Tip-in, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:01CBJVladislav GavrikovGWGAssists: Liam Foudy, Eric Robinson · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P1 19:46TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Brayden Point, Victor Hedman · Snap, 0.29 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:34CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Alexandre Texier, Boone Jenner · Snap, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:12CBJEric RobinsonENAssists: Riley Nash, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.60 xG2–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 19:16CBJNathan Gerbe: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P2 7:04TBLJan Rutta: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 11:52CBJMikhail Grigorenko: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 13:09TBLMikhail Sergachev: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 15:55CBJSeth Jones: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nash won the faceoff against Gourde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCBJ
32Shots on goal28
2.0Expected goals3.0
48Shot attempts49
30Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
24Hits24
8Blocked shots9
4Giveaways4
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Stamkos – Cirelli2:52

    xG 0.21–0.04 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Goodrow – Gourde – Joseph10:34

    xG 0.26–0.24 (52%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Stamkos – Palat – Point13:21

    xG 0.36–0.53 (40%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1

  4. Killorn – Johnson – Cirelli10:24

    xG 0.30–0.49 (38%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSergachev – Foote3:12

    xG 0.25–0.01 (94%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – Rutta4:01

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. McDonagh – Cernak2:49

    xG 0.07–0.05 (60%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Atkinson – Domi9:59

    xG 0.48–0.21 (69%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  2. Nash – Robinson – Foudy11:52

    xG 0.44–0.25 (64%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Gerbe – Grigorenko – Stenlund9:28

    xG 0.27–0.09 (74%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  4. Jenner – Bjorkstrand – Texier15:52

    xG 0.55–0.72 (44%)attempts 13–17goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski17:51

    xG 0.69–0.42 (62%)attempts 16–12goals 1–1

  2. Savard – Gavrikov17:22

    xG 0.67–0.43 (61%)attempts 16–15goals 2–0

  3. Del Zotto – Kukan14:01

    xG 0.54–0.68 (44%)attempts 9–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.0 xGTBL 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #396 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).