Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 24, 2021·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Vegas Golden Knights 1, Arizona Coyotes 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vegas Golden Knights win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsVGK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VGK0100918127
ARI040705016

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P3 19:17VGKWilliam KarlssonGWGAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 5:10VGKAlex Tuch: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 2:13VGKKeegan Kolesar: Interference bench2 min
  3. P2 4:22ARIConor Garland: Interference2 min
  4. P2 16:53ARITyler Pitlick: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VGK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← VGK attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Nosek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VGKARI
27Shots on goal16
2.9Expected goals1.1
65Shot attempts42
27Faceoffs won17
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
34Hits27
15Blocked shots16
5Giveaways5
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Karlsson – Marchessault12:00

    xG 1.17–0.13 (90%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Tuch – Kolesar – Roy6:37

    xG 0.29–0.01 (97%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  3. Reaves – Carrier – Nosek7:21

    xG 0.49–0.26 (65%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Pacioretty – Stone – Stephenson13:43

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartinez – Theodore15:53

    xG 1.29–0.19 (87%)attempts 24–13goals 1–0

  2. Hague – Whitecloud13:13

    xG 0.70–0.25 (74%)attempts 16–6goals 0–0

  3. Pietrangelo – McNabb14:52

    xG 0.38–0.33 (54%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. Larsson – Fischer – Crouse10:24

    xG 0.37–0.57 (40%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – Pitlick – Dvorak10:48

    xG 0.07–0.39 (15%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

  3. Schmaltz – Garland – Caggiula12:14

    xG 0.06–0.47 (11%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

  4. Kessel – Keller – Hayton9:02

    xG 0.18–0.67 (21%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Oesterle – Soderstrom9:02

    xG 0.20–0.17 (54%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Demers – Oesterle2:01

    xG 0.06–0.13 (32%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Chychrun18:26

    xG 0.25–0.72 (26%)attempts 13–27goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 1.1 xGVGK 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIVGK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it VGK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 9/100 · #773 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.73 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
VGK 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vegas Golden Knights win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsVGK wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − VGK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).