Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 14, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Arizona Coyotes 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI0911318230
MIN172926522

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:31MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Marcus Johansson, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:16ARIJakob ChychrunPPAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:28MINZach PariseAssists: Nick Bonino, Nico Sturm · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:14MINNick BoninoPPGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:30MINMats ZuccarelloPPAssists: Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:50MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Zach Parise, Nick Bonino · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 8:36ARIPhil KesselAssists: Dryden Hunt, Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 15:00ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:14MINKevin Fiala: Holding2 min
  3. P2 1:14MINJonas Brodin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:48ARITyler Pitlick: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:40MINMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 3:00ARIJakob Chychrun: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 12:56MINMarcus Foligno: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIMIN
30Shots on goal22
1.4Expected goals1.9
51Shot attempts47
20Faceoffs won27
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
16Hits17
16Blocked shots12
2Giveaways6
1Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Larsson – Hunt10:30

    xG 0.44–0.30 (60%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Schmaltz – Bunting – Garland8:39

    xG 0.12–0.11 (52%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  3. Pitlick – Dvorak – Crouse8:14

    xG 0.10–0.18 (37%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Fischer – Keller6:24

    xG 0.11–0.29 (27%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hjalmarsson – Demers12:00

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Lyubushkin16:01

    xG 0.16–0.24 (40%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Chychrun17:12

    xG 0.47–0.85 (36%)attempts 15–16goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:22

    xG 0.36–0.10 (79%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Zuccarello – Rask – Kaprizov10:17

    xG 0.41–0.16 (72%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Parise – Bonino – Sturm9:38

    xG 0.38–0.26 (60%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  4. Johansson – Hartman – Fiala9:36

    xG 0.13–0.33 (29%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba17:47

    xG 0.55–0.18 (76%)attempts 11–14goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Soucy14:10

    xG 0.41–0.30 (58%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon14:45

    xG 0.26–0.48 (35%)attempts 10–18goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.9 xGARI 1.4 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #480 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).