Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 18, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

New York Rangers 3, Philadelphia Flyers 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYR01111216042333
PHI160717021222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59PHINicolas Aube-KubelAssists: Michael Raffl, Kevin Hayes · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:24NYRColin BlackwellPPAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Anthony Bitetto · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 8:21NYRBrendan SmithAssists: Artemi Panarin, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–1
  4. P3 18:46PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Kevin Hayes, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.28 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Kevin Hayes stopped
  2. 2. NYR Kaapo Kakko scored
  3. 3. PHI Sean Couturier scored
  4. 4. NYR Artemi Panarin scored
  5. 5. PHI James van Riemsdyk stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:47NYRJack Johnson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:04NYRRyan Strome: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 17:52PHIAndy Andreoff: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:52PHIRobert Hagg: Holding2 min
  5. P1 18:27NYRChris Kreider: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 1:28PHIKevin Hayes: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 7:14NYRKaapo Kakko: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 11:32PHIRobert Hagg: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 16:41PHIIvan Provorov: Penalty shot slash on breakaway0 min
  10. P2 18:30NYRRyan Strome: Slashing2 min
  11. OT 2:22PHINolan Patrick: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← NYR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRPHI
33Shots on goal22
3.2Expected goals2.6
57Shot attempts60
34Faceoffs won28
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
20Hits21
27Blocked shots17
10Giveaways11
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Panarin – Kakko10:59

    xG 0.89–0.28 (76%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  2. Blackwell – Rooney – Lafrenière7:30

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Di Giuseppe – Lemieux – Howden6:58

    xG 0.10–0.12 (44%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Kreider – Zibanejad – Buchnevich7:03

    xG 0.04–0.15 (23%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Smith11:03

    xG 0.71–0.14 (83%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Bitetto – Hajek11:08

    xG 0.18–0.18 (51%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Fox – Lindgren13:47

    xG 0.44–0.44 (50%)attempts 11–17goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Andreoff – Morin – Sushko4:34

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Couturier – Farabee10:31

    xG 0.30–0.34 (47%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Kase – Bunnaman – Patrick6:10

    xG 0.00–0.14 (1%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Raffl – Aube-Kubel12:25

    xG 0.52–0.71 (42%)attempts 16–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Myers4:13

    xG 0.13–0.03 (82%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Provorov – Myers9:36

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Gustafsson – Hagg9:28

    xG 0.05–0.18 (22%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.6 xGNYR 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHINYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #179 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).