Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 20, 2021·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

San Jose Sharks 5, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 60% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS21021017527
STL0941508432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:24SJSEvander KaneAssists: Kevin Labanc · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:10SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Kevin Labanc · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:48SJSRudolfs BalcersAssists: Tomas Hertl · Snap, 0.19 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:45STLBrayden SchennAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 8:18SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P2 8:37STLZachary SanfordAssists: Torey Krug, Brayden Schenn · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P2 15:30STLRyan O'ReillyAssists: Mike Hoffman, Jordan Kyrou · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P2 18:41STLJordan KyrouAssists: David Perron, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. P3 11:51SJSLogan CoutureGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 15:00SJSLogan Couture: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 19:25SJSTimo Meier: High sticking2 min
  3. P3 7:58SJSNikolai Knyzhov: Interference2 min
  4. P3 7:58STLMike Hoffman: Embellishment2 min
  5. P3 15:24SJSMario Ferraro: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSSTL
27Shots on goal32
2.3Expected goals1.9
48Shot attempts58
26Faceoffs won29
0Power plays3
8Penalty minutes2
17Hits17
17Blocked shots13
6Giveaways12
13Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Meier – Balcers10:34

    xG 0.63–0.10 (86%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Couture – Kane – Labanc13:15

    xG 0.58–0.12 (83%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  3. Gregor – Gambrell – Leonard5:31

    xG 0.36–0.15 (71%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. Marleau – Nieto – Donato7:45

    xG 0.24–0.68 (26%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Knyzhov16:22

    xG 0.83–0.36 (70%)attempts 14–12goals 3–2

  2. Burns – Ferraro20:22

    xG 0.92–0.46 (67%)attempts 25–18goals 2–1

  3. Claesson – Meloche7:24

    xG 0.56–0.44 (56%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestClifford – Sundqvist – MacEachern4:44

    xG 0.52–0.22 (70%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Clifford – Sundqvist – de la Rose2:38

    xG 0.14–0.20 (41%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  3. Perron – O'Reilly – Kyrou13:50

    xG 0.39–0.60 (40%)attempts 13–10goals 1–2

  4. Hoffman – Schenn – Sanford12:12

    xG 0.16–0.69 (18%)attempts 7–18goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Dunn9:27

    xG 0.52–0.28 (65%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  2. Faulk – Krug17:17

    xG 0.43–0.54 (44%)attempts 12–13goals 2–1

  3. Gunnarsson – Scandella11:02

    xG 0.39–1.29 (23%)attempts 9–19goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 1.9 xGSJS 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #47 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.89 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 60% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).