Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 22, 2021·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Anaheim Ducks 3, Arizona Coyotes 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 54% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA2161606328
ARI0831314425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:09ANAJakob SilfverbergUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:27ANAMax JonesPPAssists: Maxime Comtois, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.57 xG2–0
  3. P2 1:53ANACam FowlerAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Maxime Comtois · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:15ARIChristian DvorakUnassisted · Backhand, 0.32 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:21ARIDerick BrassardAssists: Conor Garland, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 12:02ARIJakob ChychrunAssists: Drake Caggiula, Clayton Keller · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:52ARIChristian DvorakPPGWGAssists: Jakob Chychrun, Clayton Keller · Tip-in, 0.16 xG3–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 3:39ANARickard Rakell: Interference2 min
  2. P1 10:33ARITyler Pitlick: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:55ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 12:27ANAMax Jones: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 12:27ANARyan Getzlaf: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 12:27ARILawson Crouse: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 12:27ARIDarcy Kuemper: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 12:27ARIDarcy Kuemper: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 18:01ARIJohn Hayden: Fighting5 min
  10. P1 18:01ANAMax Jones: Fighting5 min
  11. P1 19:47ARILawson Crouse: Cross checking2 min
  12. P1 19:47ARILawson Crouse: Fighting5 min
  13. P1 19:47ANADerek Grant: Fighting5 min
  14. P2 3:58ANAIsac Lundeström: Elbowing2 min
  15. P2 7:43ARIConor Garland: Too many men on the ice2 min
  16. P2 8:15ANAJakob Silfverberg: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  17. P2 12:48ANAJani Hakanpää: High sticking2 min
  18. P3 2:17ANATroy Terry: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Steel won the faceoff against Dvorak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAARI
28Shots on goal25
3.8Expected goals3.6
55Shot attempts45
34Faceoffs won30
5Power plays4
22Penalty minutes24
25Hits24
11Blocked shots14
10Giveaways10
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Terry – Jones7:07

    xG 0.44–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Silfverberg – Steel – Zegras7:15

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Grant – Deslauriers – Rowney2:46

    xG 0.02–0.09 (15%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  4. Rakell – Comtois – Lundeström10:01

    xG 0.19–0.36 (35%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Hutton – Larsson13:02

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Mahura12:03

    xG 0.30–0.59 (33%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  3. Fowler – Hakanpää14:31

    xG 0.39–0.82 (32%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestSchmaltz – Garland – Keller5:23

    xG 0.69–0.35 (66%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – Kessel – Caggiula3:19

    xG 0.34–0.01 (97%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – Caggiula4:47

    xG 0.45–0.21 (69%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  4. Brassard – Kessel – Garland6:25

    xG 0.08–0.10 (45%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Chychrun14:04

    xG 0.94–0.41 (69%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Lyubushkin9:53

    xG 0.35–0.12 (74%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Hjalmarsson – Oesterle11:20

    xG 0.10–0.51 (17%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.6 xGANA 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #134 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.60 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 54% of the time.

ARI winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).