Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 24, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

New York Rangers 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR1911018327
PHI215214010439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:48PHIErik GustafssonAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:32NYRChris KreiderPPAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Adam Fox · Wrist, 0.49 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:31PHIShayne GostisbeherePPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Claude Giroux · Snap, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:05PHIJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Joel Farabee, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:03NYRChris KreiderPPAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:37PHIKevin HayesGWGAssists: Claude Giroux, Philippe Myers · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:27NYRChris KreiderAssists: Ryan Lindgren, Colin Blackwell · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 5:31NYRAlexis Lafrenière: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 9:28PHISean Couturier: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:13NYRJonny Brodzinski: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:20PHINicolas Aube-Kubel: Holding2 min
  5. P2 2:54NYRBrendan Smith: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:11NYRJulien Gauthier: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 4:33NYRPavel Buchnevich: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 7:31PHIConnor Bunnaman: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P2 15:37NYRRyan Lindgren: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P2 18:29PHICarsen Twarynski: Boarding2 min
  11. P3 9:15PHIJoel Farabee: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 14:22NYRAnthony Bitetto: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 19:51NYRPavel Buchnevich: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← NYR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRPHI
27Shots on goal39
3.8Expected goals4.7
50Shot attempts72
20Faceoffs won35
5Power plays8
16Penalty minutes10
21Hits25
18Blocked shots10
10Giveaways5
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestKreider – Blackwell – Strome8:37

    xG 1.02–0.47 (68%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  2. Lemieux – Gauthier – Howden4:23

    xG 0.30–0.12 (72%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Zibanejad – Buchnevich – Lafrenière6:17

    xG 0.07–0.48 (13%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Di Giuseppe – Brodzinski – Rooney8:03

    xG 0.02–0.66 (3%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFox – Lindgren9:32

    xG 1.16–0.30 (79%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Smith10:43

    xG 0.87–0.37 (70%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  3. Smith – Bitetto2:05

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Hayes – Patrick9:07

    xG 0.70–0.13 (84%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Couturier – Farabee7:59

    xG 0.44–0.38 (54%)attempts 10–2goals 0–1

  3. Andreoff – Morin – Twarynski4:10

    xG 0.01–0.27 (2%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Raffl – Aube-Kubel – Bunnaman9:23

    xG 0.35–0.69 (34%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Provorov8:34

    xG 0.94–0.15 (86%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  2. Gustafsson – Hagg7:21

    xG 0.31–0.38 (45%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Gustafsson3:20

    xG 0.02–0.21 (9%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.7 xGNYR 3.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHINYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #364 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.50 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).