Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 27, 2021·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Calgary Flames 6, Ottawa Senators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

OTT winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY32031305638
OTT110110114334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:00CGYJuuso VälimäkiAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Mark Giordano · Snap, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:37CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Andrew Mangiapane, Matthew Tkachuk · Snap, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P1 11:05CGYElias LindholmUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P1 13:05OTTDrake BathersonPPAssists: Thomas Chabot, Tim Stützle · Snap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:02CGYSean MonahanPPGWGAssists: Johnny Gaudreau · Snap, 0.17 xG4–1
  6. P2 9:36CGYAndrew MangiapaneSHAssists: Mikael Backlund · Tip-in, 0.23 xG5–1
  7. P2 10:16OTTColin WhitePPAssists: Nick Paul · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–2
  8. P2 16:19CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Mikael Backlund, Rasmus Andersson · Deflected, 0.09 xG6–2
  9. P3 10:00OTTBrady TkachukPPAssists: Drake Batherson, Thomas Chabot · Wrist, 0.10 xG6–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 4:38OTTAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:38CGYMilan Lucic: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:03OTTThomas Chabot: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P1 12:26CGYNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P2 3:49OTTNikita Zaitsev: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:24CGYSam Bennett: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:06OTTBrady Tkachuk: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:00OTTColin White: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 19:39CGYChris Tanev: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 8:50CGYNikita Nesterov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 11:35CGYElias Lindholm: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 19:13CGYJuuso Välimäki: Holding2 min
  13. P3 19:34OTTBrady Tkachuk: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Lindholm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYOTT
38Shots on goal34
3.2Expected goals2.7
68Shot attempts56
38Faceoffs won36
4Power plays6
17Penalty minutes15
15Hits23
11Blocked shots18
10Giveaways14
3Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Mangiapane – Tkachuk13:31

    xG 0.73–0.56 (57%)attempts 20–14goals 2–0

  2. Gaudreau – Monahan – Tkachuk2:13

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Monahan9:41

    xG 0.30–0.37 (44%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Lucic – Bennett – Dube10:49

    xG 0.28–0.43 (40%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNesterov – Välimäki13:08

    xG 0.66–0.43 (61%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  2. Giordano – Andersson11:57

    xG 0.69–0.58 (54%)attempts 23–10goals 2–0

  3. Tanev – Hanifin14:30

    xG 0.31–0.40 (44%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Batherson – Stützle8:31

    xG 0.52–0.10 (84%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Norris – Tkachuk8:48

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–2

  3. Norris – Batherson – Tkachuk2:52

    xG 0.07–0.03 (66%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Watson – Peca – Tierney5:27

    xG 0.25–0.27 (48%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Zaitsev17:15

    xG 0.84–0.74 (53%)attempts 18–23goals 0–3

  2. Gudbranson – Brannstrom10:44

    xG 0.26–0.31 (46%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

  3. Reilly – Zub12:30

    xG 0.32–0.61 (35%)attempts 13–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.7 xGCGY 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #410 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.84 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

OTT winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).