Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 7, 2021·United Center, Chicago

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

CHI winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL07416216639
CHI2101609325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:51CHIPhilipp KurashevAssists: Carl Soderberg · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:34CHIMattias JanmarkPPAssists: Dominik Kubalik, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:11CHIPius SuterAssists: Mattias Janmark · Wrist, 0.25 xG0–3
  4. P2 3:51TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:14TBLYanni GourdeAssists: Erik Cernak · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–3
  6. P2 7:51TBLVictor HedmanPPAssists: Brayden Point, Ondrej Palat · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:55TBLYanni GourdePPGWGAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Anthony Cirelli · Slap, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:25TBLAlex KillornAssists: Yanni Gourde, Ryan McDonagh · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:25TBLPatrick MaroonPPAssists: Yanni Gourde, Mathieu Joseph · Backhand, 0.34 xG6–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 13:50TBLPatrick Maroon: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:04TBLCal Foote: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:40CHIBrandon Hagel: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:51CHIIan Mitchell: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:27CHIConnor Murphy: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min · PPG
  6. P2 12:14TBLVictor Hedman: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 15:08CHIMattias Janmark: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 17:21TBLBarclay Goodrow: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 9:41TBLRyan McDonagh: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 15:57CHIDuncan Keith: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kampf won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCHI
39Shots on goal25
4.0Expected goals2.4
60Shot attempts45
27Faceoffs won32
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes18
20Hits15
14Blocked shots10
15Giveaways12
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Stamkos – Gourde9:09

    xG 0.67–0.29 (70%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Palat – Point – Cirelli11:29

    xG 0.43–0.07 (86%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Coleman – Goodrow8:03

    xG 0.31–0.42 (43%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Joseph – Volkov5:30

    xG 0.26–0.44 (37%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Cernak6:35

    xG 0.43–0.01 (97%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Hedman – Sergachev5:34

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Borgman2:07

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – DeBrincat – Suter9:49

    xG 0.39–0.31 (56%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Soderberg – Janmark – Kurashev5:11

    xG 0.21–0.31 (41%)attempts 2–8goals 1–1

  3. Kubalik – Hagel – Kampf7:30

    xG 0.02–0.43 (5%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Zadorov8:20

    xG 0.29–0.07 (79%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Carlsson – Boqvist2:37

    xG 0.21–0.02 (91%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Zadorov – Carlsson4:55

    xG 0.15–0.07 (69%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.4 xGTBL 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHITBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #73 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

CHI winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).