Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 24, 2021·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 79% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11206110228
PIT22121318542

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:36PITEvan RodriguesAssists: Sam Lafferty, Mark Jankowski · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:44PITKris LetangAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:17BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Brandon Montour, Taylor Hall · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:29PITJohn MarinoGWGAssists: Jared McCann, Zachary Aston-Reese · Slap, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 19:36PITZachary Aston-ReeseSHAssists: Frederick Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P3 3:57PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Jake Guentzel, Mike Matheson · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–5
  7. P3 14:35BUFVictor OlofssonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 19:34BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 5:41BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  3. P2 13:55PITJohn Marino: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 14:31BUFRasmus Dahlin: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 19:04PITMark Jankowski: Interference2 min
  6. P3 2:19BUFJacob Bryson: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 3:17PITKris Letang: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 14:35PITMike Matheson: Penalty shot holding on breakaway0 min
  9. P3 18:30BUFEric Staal: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lazar won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
28Shots on goal42
2.0Expected goals3.9
39Shot attempts68
30Faceoffs won34
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
33Hits17
16Blocked shots4
2Giveaways7
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestReinhart – Olofsson – Cozens2:14

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Hall – Reinhart5:04

    xG 0.36–0.23 (61%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Staal – Skinner – Hall3:34

    xG 0.08–0.07 (52%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Sheahan – Olofsson – Cozens2:34

    xG 0.10–0.13 (42%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Irwin – Miller3:00

    xG 0.02–0.05 (27%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Jokiharju – Bryson2:52

    xG 0.05–0.09 (37%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Dahlin3:40

    xG 0.06–0.11 (37%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – Lafferty – Rodrigues8:42

    xG 0.62–0.31 (67%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  2. Sceviour – Gaudreau – Angello6:42

    xG 0.20–0.07 (75%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel12:44

    xG 0.61–0.60 (51%)attempts 18–13goals 1–0

  4. Kapanen – McCann – Aston-Reese6:37

    xG 0.18–0.20 (48%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Marino14:58

    xG 0.45–0.08 (85%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin15:10

    xG 0.93–0.61 (60%)attempts 23–12goals 1–0

  3. Matheson – Ceci11:29

    xG 0.39–0.56 (41%)attempts 10–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.9 xGBUF 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #483 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 79% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).