Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 31, 2021·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Buffalo Sabres 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 50% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI07114011132
BUF2102829627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:32BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Kyle Okposo, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:59BUFCurtis LazarGWGAssists: Riley Sheahan · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:50PHIIvan ProvorovAssists: Sean Couturier, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:42BUFSteven FogartyAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jacob Bryson · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:39BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Steven Fogarty, Jacob Bryson · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P3 14:53BUFBrandon MontourENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.50 xG1–5
  7. P3 15:30BUFBrandon MontourSHAssists: Kyle Okposo · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–6
Penalties (3)
  1. P2 0:54BUFTage Thompson: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 16:51BUFHenri Jokiharju: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P3 13:38BUFTage Thompson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lazar won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
32Shots on goal27
3.0Expected goals3.0
61Shot attempts43
34Faceoffs won25
3Power plays0
0Penalty minutes6
15Hits13
6Blocked shots13
1Giveaways3
0Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Raffl – Aube-Kubel4:09

    xG 0.64–0.01 (98%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Hayes – Konecny11:07

    xG 0.79–0.53 (60%)attempts 15–8goals 0–1

  3. Twarynski – Bunnaman – Farabee3:58

    xG 0.10–0.02 (85%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Laughton – Raffl – Farabee2:09

    xG 0.06–0.01 (82%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Sanheim2:49

    xG 0.37–0.01 (98%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – Myers14:11

    xG 0.60–0.41 (59%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Gustafsson – Myers2:42

    xG 0.09–0.01 (89%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestEakin – Rieder – Fogarty6:52

    xG 0.25–0.06 (80%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  2. Sheahan – Skinner – Lazar5:15

    xG 0.23–0.10 (70%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  3. Okposo – Reinhart – Olofsson7:19

    xG 0.26–0.19 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  4. Hall – Thompson – Mittelstadt10:06

    xG 0.14–0.98 (12%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRistolainen – Bryson17:47

    xG 1.41–0.56 (71%)attempts 15–16goals 4–0

  2. Miller – Dahlin2:26

    xG 0.01–0.04 (22%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Montour14:54

    xG 0.53–1.02 (34%)attempts 13–18goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.0 xGPHI 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #637 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 50% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).