Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 16, 2021·Ball Arena, Denver

Anaheim Ducks 4, Colorado Avalanche 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 85% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA470708422
COL210213413836

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:01COLAndre BurakovskyAssists: Nazem Kadri, Samuel Girard · Backhand, 0.33 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:16ANATroy TerryAssists: Trevor Zegras, Adam Henrique · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 4:33ANADanton HeinenAssists: Ben Hutton, Adam Henrique · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P1 7:02COLNazem KadriAssists: Brandon Saad, Devon Toews · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P1 15:59ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P1 19:42ANADerek GrantUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG4–2
  7. P2 11:25COLMikko RantanenAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Devon Toews · Backhand, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P2 18:26COLNazem KadriAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Joonas Donskoi · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. P3 1:01COLNathan MacKinnonPPGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Mikko Rantanen · Slap, 0.04 xG4–5
  10. P3 3:24COLSamuel GirardUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–6
  11. P3 16:48COLPierre-Edouard BellemareENAssists: Nazem Kadri, Matt Calvert · Wrist, 0.54 xG4–7
  12. P3 18:45COLBrandon SaadPPAssists: Joonas Donskoi, Valeri Nichushkin · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–8
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 18:25ANAJani Hakanpää: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:42COLGabriel Landeskog: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  3. P2 2:15COLGreg Pateryn: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 19:06ANACam Fowler: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 6:35COLMikko Rantanen: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 10:28ANANicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 10:28COLNazem Kadri: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 17:29ANAJani Hakanpää: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACOL
22Shots on goal36
1.5Expected goals3.8
37Shot attempts76
33Faceoffs won29
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
19Hits21
24Blocked shots12
7Giveaways7
6Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Terry – Zegras8:45

    xG 0.42–0.28 (60%)attempts 9–9goals 2–1

  2. Getzlaf – Rakell – Jones2:29

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Grant – Deslauriers – Heinen8:21

    xG 0.10–0.23 (29%)attempts 1–11goals 0–0

  4. Silfverberg – Jones – Lundeström5:27

    xG 0.05–0.23 (19%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – Hakanpää15:00

    xG 0.12–0.41 (22%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Mahura14:34

    xG 0.40–0.84 (32%)attempts 11–24goals 1–1

  3. Hutton – Larsson13:06

    xG 0.34–1.09 (24%)attempts 6–21goals 1–3

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Saad – Burakovsky9:04

    xG 1.13–0.14 (89%)attempts 18–4goals 2–1

  2. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen14:10

    xG 0.78–0.04 (95%)attempts 19–5goals 1–0

  3. Calvert – Bellemare – O'Connor9:11

    xG 0.38–0.12 (75%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  4. Donskoi – Nichushkin – Jost9:16

    xG 0.15–0.43 (25%)attempts 9–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGraves – Toews7:03

    xG 0.73–0.04 (95%)attempts 10–3goals 2–0

  2. Toews – Girard7:22

    xG 0.68–0.05 (93%)attempts 11–3goals 2–0

  3. Pateryn – Renouf10:21

    xG 0.55–0.15 (78%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.8 xGANA 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #48 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.06 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 85% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).