Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 8, 2021·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Columbus Blue Jackets 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL41221107630
CBJ1181929436

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:58TBLBlake ColemanAssists: Yanni Gourde, Barclay Goodrow · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:41TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Ondrej Palat · Snap, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 5:41TBLBarclay GoodrowAssists: Yanni Gourde, Blake Coleman · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–0
  4. P1 17:21CBJMichael Del ZottoAssists: Jack Roslovic, Elvis Merzlikins · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P1 19:59TBLRyan McDonaghAssists: Yanni Gourde, Blake Coleman · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–1
  6. P2 4:54TBLRoss ColtonGWGAssists: Tyler Johnson, Patrick Maroon · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–1
  7. P2 17:08CBJJack RoslovicAssists: Mikhail Grigorenko, Cam Atkinson · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–2
  8. P2 18:56TBLRyan McDonaghAssists: Yanni Gourde, Barclay Goodrow · Slap, 0.05 xG6–2
  9. P3 10:41CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Alexandre Texier, Jack Roslovic · Wrist, 0.06 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:14CBJMax DomiAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Dean Kukan · Wrist, 0.04 xG6–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:29CBJNick Foligno: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:03TBLOndrej Palat: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 18:56CBJJack Roslovic: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  4. P3 3:48CBJAlexandre Texier: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 7:29TBLCal Foote: Instigator2 min
  6. P3 7:29TBLCal Foote: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 7:29TBLCal Foote: Instigator misconduct10 min
  8. P3 7:29CBJStefan Matteau: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 7:43CBJJack Roslovic: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cirelli won the faceoff against Roslovic
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCBJ
30Shots on goal36
3.6Expected goals2.3
55Shot attempts52
34Faceoffs won26
4Power plays2
19Penalty minutes13
15Hits23
6Blocked shots12
7Giveaways10
2Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestColeman – Goodrow – Gourde11:22

    xG 1.85–0.17 (92%)attempts 20–4goals 4–0

  2. Stamkos – Palat – Point9:30

    xG 0.66–0.23 (74%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Maroon – Johnson – Colton8:49

    xG 0.43–0.30 (59%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Joseph – Cirelli8:58

    xG 0.23–0.38 (38%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Sergachev2:39

    xG 0.92–0.25 (79%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  2. McDonagh – Thomas13:01

    xG 0.74–0.41 (64%)attempts 11–13goals 2–1

  3. Cernak – Sergachev5:01

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Atkinson – Grigorenko – Roslovic11:32

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 12–8goals 2–0

  2. Dalpe – Matteau – Foudy5:01

    xG 0.07–0.32 (17%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  3. Bjorkstrand – Domi – Laine11:36

    xG 0.56–1.07 (34%)attempts 11–12goals 1–3

  4. Foligno – Texier – Robinson9:59

    xG 0.28–0.92 (23%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gavrikov15:51

    xG 0.71–0.33 (69%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  2. Kukan – Lehtonen14:39

    xG 0.32–1.22 (21%)attempts 11–18goals 1–2

  3. Jones – Werenski16:42

    xG 0.43–1.73 (20%)attempts 13–18goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.3 xGTBL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #210 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).