Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, May 19, 2021·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 2, Calgary Flames 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 86% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0521006221
CGY3921019628

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:41CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Juuso Välimäki · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:16CGYDillon DubeAssists: Derek Ryan, Brett Ritchie · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:18CGYAndrew MangiapaneGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, Joakim Nordstrom · Wrist, 0.37 xG0–3
  4. P2 5:14CGYBrett RitchieAssists: Derek Ryan, Dillon Dube · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–4
  5. P2 8:34VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Brock Boeser, Jack Rathbone · Snap, 0.15 xG1–4
  6. P2 9:32VANJ.T. MillerAssists: Brock Boeser, Tyler Myers · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P2 10:29CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–5
  8. P3 3:29CGYConnor MackeyAssists: Brett Ritchie, Derek Ryan · Wrist, 0.36 xG2–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:36CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:11CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 13:11VANJalen Chatfield: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 8:01CGYMark Giordano: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:26CGYJuuso Välimäki: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 4:42CGYMilan Lucic: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 6:27VANBo Horvat: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 11:09CGYMichael Stone: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 18:14VANJalen Chatfield: Interference2 min
  10. P3 19:35CGYAdam Ruzicka: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Miller won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
21Shots on goal28
2.2Expected goals4.8
43Shot attempts52
29Faceoffs won32
5Power plays2
6Penalty minutes14
9Hits6
8Blocked shots9
11Giveaways14
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHorvat – Highmore – Lind6:14

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Boyd – Vesey – Lockwood5:17

    xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  3. Miller – Vesey – Lockwood2:39

    xG 0.00–0.49 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–1

  4. Graovac – Hawryluk – Michaelis3:18

    xG 0.02–0.51 (3%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Rathbone7:53

    xG 0.40–0.21 (66%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Schmidt – Chatfield8:48

    xG 0.69–1.32 (34%)attempts 10–9goals 0–2

  3. Hamonic – Hughes8:08

    xG 0.09–1.28 (6%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Phillips – Ruzicka6:40

    xG 0.41–0.04 (90%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk6:26

    xG 0.93–0.57 (62%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Backlund – Nordstrom – Mangiapane4:29

    xG 0.57–0.26 (69%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Ritchie – Ryan – Dube3:07

    xG 0.15–0.02 (90%)attempts 1–1goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Tanev10:15

    xG 1.84–0.16 (92%)attempts 13–4goals 3–0

  2. Stone – Mackey6:49

    xG 0.73–0.16 (82%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Andersson – Välimäki9:46

    xG 0.40–0.80 (33%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 4.8 xGVAN 2.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #323 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.70 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 86% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).