Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 20, 2021·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 65% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT2908014231
TOR0701009026

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:46PITJake GuentzelGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, Brian Dumoulin · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:15PITJeff CarterAssists: Jason Zucker, Kasperi Kapanen · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 18:52TORMorgan Rielly: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 10:56PITBrian Dumoulin: Interference2 min
  3. P3 8:21PITJeff Carter: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 14:47PITJason Zucker: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 14:58PITZachary Aston-Reese: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTOR
31Shots on goal26
2.0Expected goals2.8
47Shot attempts64
19Faceoffs won22
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
26Hits29
20Blocked shots10
9Giveaways17
15Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHeinen – Rodrigues – Simon6:22

    xG 0.16–0.05 (77%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel12:40

    xG 0.39–0.47 (45%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  3. Carter – Zucker – Kapanen11:55

    xG 0.36–0.51 (41%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  4. Blueger – McGinn – Aston-Reese10:18

    xG 0.43–0.67 (39%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin19:09

    xG 1.02–0.60 (63%)attempts 17–22goals 1–0

  2. Matheson – Ruhwedel9:58

    xG 0.25–0.21 (54%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. Matheson – Pettersson2:25

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Simmonds – Bunting8:25

    xG 0.71–0.26 (73%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Ritchie – Marner – Matthews11:57

    xG 0.45–0.24 (65%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  3. Tavares – Kerfoot – Nylander10:24

    xG 0.21–0.37 (36%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  4. Engvall – Kase – Kampf10:28

    xG 0.28–0.78 (27%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Holl15:01

    xG 0.83–0.60 (58%)attempts 17–15goals 0–1

  2. Brodie – Rielly17:55

    xG 0.40–0.31 (56%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  3. Liljegren – Sandin11:50

    xG 0.30–0.55 (35%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.8 xGPIT 2.0 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 1/100 · #1311 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 65% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).