Fri, Nov 26, 2021·Nationwide Arena, Columbus
Vancouver Canucks 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 113 | 116 | 012 | 241 |
| CBJ | 14 | 16 | 211 | 421 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 13:54CBJGustav NyquistSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
- P1 19:31VANVasily PodkolzinAssists: Justin Dowling · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
- P2 6:17CBJAdam BoqvistAssists: Cole Sillinger, Gavin Bayreuther · Snap, 0.23 xG1–2
- P2 18:42VANTyler MotteAssists: Quinn Hughes, Alex Chiasson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–2
- P3 6:06CBJJack RoslovicGWGAssists: Jakub Voracek, Vladislav Gavrikov · Snap, 0.09 xG2–3
- P3 18:25CBJMax DomiENAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Vladislav Gavrikov · Snap, 0.79 xG2–4
Penalties (3)
- P1 7:50VANJustin Dowling: Tripping2 min
- P1 12:36CBJZach Werenski: Roughing2 min
- P2 10:28CBJEgor Chinakhov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Roslovic won the faceoff against Horvat
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestPearson – Horvat – Garland11:47
xG 0.54–0.23 (70%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0
- Dowling – Pettersson – Podkolzin10:18
xG 0.37–0.17 (69%)attempts 15–4goals 1–0
- Miller – Boeser – Hoglander10:04
xG 0.28–0.15 (65%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0
- Miller – Boeser – Pettersson2:21
xG 0.04–0.07 (35%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSchenn – Hughes17:07
xG 1.10–0.31 (78%)attempts 28–12goals 1–1
- Burroughs – Poolman10:28
xG 0.24–0.04 (85%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Poolman – Hughes2:02
xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestVoracek – Roslovic – Chinakhov3:14
xG 0.26–0.02 (93%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0
- Hofmann – Bjorkstrand – Sillinger2:47
xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Hofmann – Domi – Roslovic5:37
xG 0.11–0.10 (52%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0
- Voracek – Chinakhov – Sillinger5:52
xG 0.32–0.31 (50%)attempts 3–8goals 1–1
Defence pairs
- bestBayreuther – Boqvist10:22
xG 0.55–0.13 (81%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0
- Gavrikov – Peeke13:54
xG 0.26–0.70 (27%)attempts 9–20goals 1–0
- Werenski – Bean22:08
xG 0.32–0.99 (24%)attempts 17–26goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CBJ − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).