Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 1, 2021·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Vancouver Canucks 6, Ottawa Senators 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 81% of the time.

OTT winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN111210314635
OTT1110515221

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:38VANTanner PearsonAssists: Conor Garland, Luke Schenn · Snap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:52OTTAdam GaudettePPAssists: Connor Brown, Chris Tierney · Slap, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:38VANTyler MotteAssists: Conor Garland, Kyle Burroughs · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:31VANLuke SchennGWGAssists: Quinn Hughes, J.T. Miller · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P3 4:02VANBo HorvatAssists: Quinn Hughes, Thatcher Demko · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–1
  6. P3 7:38VANAlex ChiassonPPAssists: J.T. Miller, Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.31 xG5–1
  7. P3 13:42OTTBrady TkachukAssists: Victor Mete, Josh Norris · Backhand, 0.08 xG5–2
  8. P3 17:10VANJ.T. MillerPPAssists: Elias Pettersson, Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.19 xG6–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 4:22OTTBrady Tkachuk: Interference2 min
  2. P1 11:34VANAlex Chiasson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:14VANTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 6:30VANBo Horvat: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:30VANTanner Pearson: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 10:05OTTNikita Zaitsev: Interference2 min
  7. P2 18:03VANOliver Ekman-Larsson: Interference2 min
  8. P2 18:12OTTDrake Batherson: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 3:26OTTConnor Brown: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 3:26VANNils Hoglander: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 7:31OTTArtem Zub: Interference2 min · PPG
  12. P3 16:19OTTZachary Sanford: Roughing2 min · PPG
  13. P3 17:10OTTVictor Mete: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Miller
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANOTT
35Shots on goal21
4.2Expected goals2.1
73Shot attempts38
31Faceoffs won32
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes14
22Hits21
8Blocked shots23
4Giveaways16
5Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPearson – Horvat – Garland8:27

    xG 0.86–0.02 (97%)attempts 12–1goals 1–0

  2. Dowling – Pettersson – Hoglander3:27

    xG 0.24–0.13 (64%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Boeser – Hoglander2:44

    xG 0.14–0.15 (47%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Miller – Boeser – Podkolzin7:03

    xG 0.14–0.17 (45%)attempts 13–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchenn – Hughes11:49

    xG 1.03–0.39 (73%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Burroughs – Poolman10:22

    xG 0.58–0.30 (66%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  3. Myers – Ekman-Larsson14:48

    xG 0.33–0.37 (47%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestTierney – Paul – Sanford2:37

    xG 0.20–0.02 (90%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Watson – Sanford – Gambrell3:55

    xG 0.12–0.10 (56%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Norris – Batherson – Tkachuk13:48

    xG 0.31–0.42 (43%)attempts 7–16goals 1–0

  4. Brown – Formenton – Stützle4:25

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Thomson11:01

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Chabot – Zaitsev2:28

    xG 0.19–0.09 (67%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Mete – Zaitsev10:45

    xG 0.33–0.69 (32%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.1 xGVAN 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #804 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 81% of the time.

OTT winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).