Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 6, 2021·Capital One Arena, Washington

Anaheim Ducks 3, Washington Capitals 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 64% of the time.

WSH winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA010313010012334
WSH11121008003429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:34WSHTom WilsonAssists: Justin Schultz, Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:09ANAJosh MansonAssists: Sonny Milano, Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:58WSHCarl HagelinAssists: Lars Eller, T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:35ANASonny MilanoAssists: Trevor Zegras, Rickard Rakell · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:29ANAVinni LettieriAssists: Cam Fowler, Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:37WSHJohn CarlsonAssists: Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Troy Terry scored
  2. 2. WSH T.J. Oshie stopped
  3. 3. ANA Trevor Zegras stopped
  4. 4. WSH Evgeny Kuznetsov stopped
  5. 5. ANA Kevin Shattenkirk stopped
  6. 6. WSH Daniel Sprong scored
  7. 7. ANA Rickard Rakell scored
  8. 8. WSH Alex Ovechkin scored
  9. 9. ANA Sonny Milano stopped
  10. 10. WSH John Carlson scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 17:14WSHMartin Fehérváry: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P2 11:07ANASimon Benoit: Interference2 min
  3. P2 13:17WSHTom Wilson: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 13:17ANASimon Benoit: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundeström won the faceoff against McMichael
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAWSH
34Shots on goal29
2.3Expected goals3.1
52Shot attempts63
27Faceoffs won26
1Power plays1
7Penalty minutes7
24Hits27
15Blocked shots10
3Giveaways4
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestRakell – Milano – Zegras17:19

    xG 1.29–0.60 (68%)attempts 20–14goals 2–0

  2. Deslauriers – Carrick – Robinson5:24

    xG 0.23–0.14 (63%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Terry – Steel – Lettieri9:42

    xG 0.34–0.61 (36%)attempts 9–9goals 1–2

  4. Grant – Silfverberg – Lundeström14:04

    xG 0.16–1.08 (13%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Drysdale16:22

    xG 0.81–0.42 (66%)attempts 18–11goals 1–0

  2. Manson – Lindholm2:13

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Shattenkirk – Lindholm2:41

    xG 0.01–0.10 (10%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestSheary – Sprong – McMichael5:31

    xG 0.50–0.10 (83%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Ovechkin – Kuznetsov – Wilson13:09

    xG 1.06–0.75 (59%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1

  3. Ovechkin – Oshie – Eller2:21

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Malenstyn – Leason – Protas7:02

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Fehérváry18:06

    xG 1.04–0.68 (60%)attempts 15–17goals 1–1

  2. Schultz – Irwin13:22

    xG 1.12–0.80 (58%)attempts 19–14goals 1–1

  3. Orlov – Jensen20:35

    xG 0.49–0.68 (42%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 3.1 xGANA 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #406 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 64% of the time.

WSH winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).