Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 17, 2022·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Anaheim Ducks 3, Edmonton Oilers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA2807115330
EDM116314311741

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:39ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Cam Fowler, Jakob Silfverberg · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:14ANASonny MilanoPPAssists: Trevor Zegras, Jamie Drysdale · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:46EDMEvander KanePPAssists: Ryan McLeod, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:12EDMDerek RyanAssists: Cody Ceci, Warren Foegele · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:26EDMJesse PuljujarviAssists: Connor McDavid, Zach Hyman · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:21EDMLeon DraisaitlGWGAssists: Ryan McLeod, Evander Kane · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:21EDMWarren FoegeleAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Derek Ryan · Snap, 0.14 xG2–5
  8. P3 9:17ANATrevor ZegrasAssists: Rickard Rakell, Sonny Milano · Snap, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P3 10:19EDMLeon DraisaitlUnassisted · Snap, 0.13 xG3–6
  10. P3 11:37EDMZach HymanAssists: Connor McDavid, Kailer Yamamoto · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–7
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:18ANATroy Terry: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 2:42EDMTyson Barrie: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:27EDMDarnell Nurse: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:52ANAIsac Lundeström: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 0:00EDMConnor McDavid: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 5:12ANASam Carrick: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P3 12:21ANAHampus Lindholm: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Steel won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAEDM
30Shots on goal41
2.8Expected goals3.6
42Shot attempts61
28Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
30Hits22
14Blocked shots4
16Giveaways13
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Terry – Steel10:33

    xG 0.71–0.45 (61%)attempts 11–8goals 0–3

  2. Grant – Deslauriers – Carrick7:24

    xG 0.59–0.39 (60%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Rakell – Milano – Zegras9:58

    xG 0.32–0.47 (40%)attempts 5–11goals 1–2

  4. Silfverberg – Comtois – Lundeström10:02

    xG 0.21–0.92 (18%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Mahura7:10

    xG 0.88–0.27 (76%)attempts 10–7goals 0–2

  2. Shattenkirk – Fowler14:17

    xG 0.43–0.50 (46%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Lindholm – Drysdale17:44

    xG 0.51–0.92 (36%)attempts 10–17goals 1–3

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – McDavid – Puljujarvi6:17

    xG 0.55–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–0goals 1–0

  2. Hyman – McDavid – Yamamoto6:05

    xG 0.44–0.11 (80%)attempts 5–2goals 1–1

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Foegele – Ryan6:35

    xG 0.52–0.34 (61%)attempts 10–6goals 2–0

  4. Kane – Draisaitl – McLeod5:43

    xG 0.27–0.29 (48%)attempts 4–4goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiemelainen – Bouchard4:08

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Nurse10:02

    xG 0.41–0.18 (70%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  3. Ceci – Broberg2:19

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.6 xGANA 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #282 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).