Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 20, 2022·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF28110018336
CBJ21931228739

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:47CBJDean KukanAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Max Domi · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:05BUFMark PysykAssists: Victor Olofsson, Dylan Cozens · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:14BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P1 17:24CBJBoone JennerAssists: Jakub Voracek, Patrik Laine · Tip-in, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P2 3:28CBJDean KukanAssists: Gavin Bayreuther, Brendan Gaunce · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P2 8:16CBJZach WerenskiGWGAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Boone Jenner · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P2 17:43CBJBrendan GaunceAssists: Patrik Laine, Dean Kukan · Snap, 0.14 xG2–5
  8. P2 19:28BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Peyton Krebs, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:24CBJGustav NyquistENAssists: Sean Kuraly, Vladislav Gavrikov · Wrist, 0.76 xG3–6
  10. P3 19:56CBJJustin DanforthAssists: Brendan Gaunce · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–7
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:48BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:44BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:45CBJBrendan Gaunce: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 19:28CBJVladislav Gavrikov: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 19:28BUFPeyton Krebs: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Jenner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
36Shots on goal39
3.0Expected goals3.9
59Shot attempts60
37Faceoffs won36
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
15Hits17
8Blocked shots12
3Giveaways6
10Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Asplund – Cozens7:49

    xG 0.56–0.29 (66%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – Mittelstadt – Krebs5:52

    xG 0.36–0.22 (62%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Eakin – Hayden – Bjork7:56

    xG 0.17–0.20 (46%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

  4. Okposo – Asplund – Mittelstadt4:28

    xG 0.23–0.31 (42%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPysyk – Hagg12:34

    xG 0.65–0.28 (70%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  2. Bryson – Samuelsson2:06

    xG 0.17–0.06 (74%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Fitzgerald – Jokiharju2:09

    xG 0.05–0.11 (32%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestGaunce – Roslovic – Danforth6:33

    xG 0.62–0.17 (78%)attempts 11–5goals 2–0

  2. Kuraly – Domi – Chinakhov11:22

    xG 0.79–0.43 (65%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  3. Nyquist – Bjorkstrand – Sillinger9:51

    xG 0.47–0.49 (49%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  4. Voracek – Jenner – Laine13:21

    xG 0.54–0.80 (40%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGavrikov – Boqvist12:40

    xG 0.96–0.32 (75%)attempts 17–8goals 0–1

  2. Kukan – Bayreuther9:18

    xG 0.65–0.34 (66%)attempts 9–8goals 2–1

  3. Gavrikov – Peeke2:15

    xG 0.02–0.07 (19%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.9 xGBUF 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #370 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.48 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).