Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 4, 2022·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Tampa Bay Lightning 7, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL31421428736
CBJ072807222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:53TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Brayden Point, Victor Hedman · Snap, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:30TBLOndrej PalatAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Brayden Point · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:27TBLCorey PerryPPGWGAssists: Patrick Maroon, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–0
  4. P2 0:37CBJDean KukanAssists: Gustav Nyquist, Adam Boqvist · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 1:36TBLBrayden PointAssists: Cal Foote, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P2 4:16CBJGustav NyquistAssists: Andrew Peeke, Vladislav Gavrikov · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P2 12:19TBLPatrick MaroonPPAssists: Corey Perry, Anthony Cirelli · Backhand, 0.30 xG5–2
  8. P3 0:36TBLPierre-Edouard BellemareAssists: Jan Rutta · Snap, 0.10 xG6–2
  9. P3 12:20TBLAlex KillornAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.12 xG7–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:18CBJSean Kuraly: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:51TBLOndrej Palat: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:04CBJDean Kukan: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:09CBJBoone Jenner: Holding2 min
  5. P2 12:10CBJScott Harrington: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:45TBLErik Cernak: Interference2 min
  7. P3 17:18TBLAlex Killorn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
48% to win52% to win
← TBL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sillinger won the faceoff against Bellemare
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCBJ
36Shots on goal22
3.7Expected goals1.8
61Shot attempts48
28Faceoffs won29
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
14Hits17
11Blocked shots13
4Giveaways13
9Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Katchouk – Raddysh9:09

    xG 0.39–0.12 (77%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Killorn – Stamkos – Cirelli11:39

    xG 0.79–0.55 (59%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  3. Perry – Maroon – Bellemare10:53

    xG 0.35–0.24 (59%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  4. Palat – Point – Joseph9:27

    xG 0.37–0.29 (57%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Rutta13:06

    xG 0.85–0.34 (71%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  2. McDonagh – Cernak15:25

    xG 0.78–0.47 (62%)attempts 20–9goals 1–1

  3. McDonagh – Foote2:05

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Roslovic – Bemstrom – Robinson7:22

    xG 0.03–0.08 (29%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  2. Nyquist – Kuraly – Domi9:58

    xG 0.29–0.42 (41%)attempts 6–11goals 2–0

  3. Jenner – Bjorkstrand – Chinakhov11:46

    xG 0.28–0.48 (37%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  4. Voracek – Laine – Sillinger10:25

    xG 0.32–0.59 (35%)attempts 6–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Kukan – Boqvist16:30

    xG 0.79–0.77 (51%)attempts 17–15goals 1–2

  2. Harrington – Carlsson13:43

    xG 0.17–0.54 (24%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Gavrikov – Peeke16:09

    xG 0.58–0.95 (38%)attempts 14–19goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.8 xGTBL 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #712 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).