Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 18, 2022·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Florida Panthers 1, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 59% of the time.

CGY winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA01118010129
CGY21011427531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:36CGYRasmus AnderssonPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:36CGYBlake ColemanGWGAssists: Andrew Mangiapane, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:36FLASam BennettAssists: Mason Marchment, Carter Verhaeghe · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:03CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:47CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Elias Lindholm, Johnny Gaudreau · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:43CGYSean MonahanAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:13FLACarter Verhaeghe: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:08CGYDillon Dube: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 11:51FLARyan Lomberg: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:34FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 19:34CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 0:21CGYElias Lindholm: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 16:00FLAFrank Vatrano: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 11:33FLAAaron Ekblad: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 11:33CGYAndrew Mangiapane: Holding2 min
  10. P3 19:05CGYNikita Zadorov: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 19:05FLARyan Lomberg: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 19:05CGYBrett Ritchie: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
48% to win52% to win
← FLA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACGY
29Shots on goal31
3.4Expected goals2.8
58Shot attempts50
25Faceoffs won40
3Power plays3
12Penalty minutes12
14Hits15
12Blocked shots11
12Giveaways21
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Lomberg – Luostarinen3:30

    xG 0.37–0.16 (69%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  2. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart7:25

    xG 0.47–0.36 (56%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  3. Reinhart – Vatrano – Lundell3:03

    xG 0.16–0.07 (70%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Marchment – Lomberg – Luostarinen2:31

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Ekblad13:23

    xG 1.34–0.37 (78%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  2. Gudas – Juolevi2:22

    xG 0.10–0.21 (33%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Forsling5:39

    xG 0.18–0.31 (36%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk11:34

    xG 0.81–0.62 (57%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Lucic – Monahan – Dube11:05

    xG 0.36–0.44 (45%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Lewis – Ritchie8:16

    xG 0.28–0.38 (42%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Backlund – Coleman – Mangiapane14:01

    xG 0.39–0.78 (33%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Zadorov13:34

    xG 0.79–0.40 (67%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Andersson – Kylington2:23

    xG 0.00–0.00 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Hanifin – Andersson16:37

    xG 0.82–0.92 (47%)attempts 15–11goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.8 xGFLA 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #1019 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.85 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 59% of the time.

CGY winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).