Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 20, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Ottawa Senators 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT12207314443
PIT31221418634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:28PITDominik SimonAssists: Jeff Carter · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:12OTTDrake BathersonAssists: Nick Holden · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:40PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Kasperi Kapanen, Mike Matheson · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P1 15:59PITMike MathesonAssists: Brock McGinn, Teddy Blueger · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P2 11:32PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Kris Letang · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:41PITMike MathesonGWGAssists: Jeff Carter, John Marino · Snap, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P3 1:45OTTTim StützleAssists: Zachary Sanford, Alex Formenton · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–5
  8. P3 3:33OTTJosh NorrisAssists: Drake Batherson, Brady Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:02OTTJosh NorrisAssists: Erik Brannstrom, Brady Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:13PITJake GuentzelENAssists: Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.62 xG4–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 6:15PITBrian Boyle: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:15OTTAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:21OTTDrake Batherson: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 17:31PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 19:47OTTArtem Zub: Interference2 min
  6. P1 19:52PITBryan Rust: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P2 10:44OTTArtem Zub: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 14:06PITKasperi Kapanen: Holding2 min
  9. P3 5:49OTTJacob Bernard-Docker: Interference2 min
  10. P3 7:27PITEvan Rodrigues: Penalty shot holding on breakaway0 min
  11. P3 7:51PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 7:51OTTAlex Formenton: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 19:50PITJohn Marino: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 19:50OTTBrady Tkachuk: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← OTT attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPIT
43Shots on goal34
3.6Expected goals3.9
69Shot attempts53
33Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
20Penalty minutes18
56Hits45
9Blocked shots20
4Giveaways8
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNorris – Batherson – Tkachuk11:02

    xG 1.24–0.79 (61%)attempts 22–11goals 1–1

  2. Tierney – Bishop – Gaudette7:58

    xG 0.39–0.24 (62%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Sanford – Formenton – Stützle7:40

    xG 0.34–0.23 (60%)attempts 11–5goals 1–2

  4. Watson – Paul – Gambrell7:48

    xG 0.18–0.54 (25%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Bernard-Docker13:00

    xG 0.91–0.34 (73%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

  2. Brown – Brannstrom8:31

    xG 0.73–0.48 (60%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. Holden – Zub10:52

    xG 0.67–0.64 (51%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Blueger – McGinn8:47

    xG 0.46–0.15 (76%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Rodrigues – Simon8:27

    xG 0.25–0.44 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 1–2

  3. Malkin – Kapanen – Heinen9:35

    xG 0.43–0.67 (39%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel11:48

    xG 0.50–1.02 (33%)attempts 9–20goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Marino11:38

    xG 0.99–0.39 (72%)attempts 14–8goals 2–1

  2. Ruhwedel – Pettersson6:55

    xG 0.19–0.06 (75%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Matheson – Ruhwedel3:27

    xG 0.33–0.52 (39%)attempts 4–5goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.9 xGOTT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #141 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).