Thu, Mar 10, 2022·Prudential Center, Newark
Winnipeg Jets 2, New Jersey Devils 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 75% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 19 | 17 | 014 | 230 |
| NJD | 115 | 011 | 08 | 134 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:22WPGBrenden DillonAssists: Mark Scheifele, Blake Wheeler · Snap, 0.14 xG1–0
- P1 18:27NJDJack HughesPPAssists: Jesper Bratt, Damon Severson · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
- P2 19:06WPGKyle ConnorGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–1
Penalties (5)
- P1 11:46WPGLogan Stanley: Cross checking2 min
- P1 17:57WPGBrenden Dillon: Cross checking2 min · PPG
- P3 2:59WPGDylan DeMelo: Hooking2 min
- P3 11:50NJDTy Smith: Hooking2 min
- P3 18:25NJDDougie Hamilton: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Scheifele won the faceoff against McLeod
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestConnor – Svechnikov – Dubois11:53
xG 0.82–0.73 (53%)attempts 10–19goals 1–0
- Lowry – Copp – Ehlers9:27
xG 0.72–0.63 (53%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0
- Wheeler – Stastny – Scheifele14:14
xG 0.64–0.80 (44%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0
- Toninato – Harkins – Vesalainen6:17
xG 0.08–0.61 (12%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- DeMelo – Morrissey19:36
xG 1.07–1.13 (49%)attempts 21–18goals 0–0
- Dillon – Pionk13:07
xG 0.57–1.07 (35%)attempts 11–20goals 1–0
- Schmidt – Stanley11:59
xG 0.34–0.88 (28%)attempts 9–17goals 0–0
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestGeertsen – Bastian – McLeod4:47
xG 0.48–0.03 (95%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Vesey – Johnsson – Boqvist8:43
xG 0.84–0.43 (66%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0
- Sharangovich – Hughes – Mercer11:50
xG 0.86–0.53 (62%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0
- Tatar – Zacha – Bratt11:29
xG 0.36–0.55 (39%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSubban – Smith13:06
xG 1.35–0.58 (70%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0
- Severson – Siegenthaler16:54
xG 0.81–0.59 (58%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0
- Hamilton – Graves16:53
xG 0.62–1.10 (36%)attempts 11–22goals 0–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 75% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NJD − WPG), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).