Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 5, 2022·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Boston Bruins 3, Detroit Red Wings 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 69% of the time.

DET winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS218015117350
DET11221225529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:43BOSErik HaulaAssists: Taylor Hall, Tomas Nosek · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:17BOSBrandon CarloSHAssists: Derek Forbort, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:20DETDylan LarkinAssists: Moritz Seider, Lucas Raymond · Snap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 5:46DETMichael RasmussenAssists: Adam Erne, Danny DeKeyser · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:32DETFilip ZadinaAssists: Jakub Vrana, Pius Suter · Slap, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:08DETJakub VranaPPGWGAssists: Filip Hronek, Jake Walman · Snap, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:24BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Charlie McAvoy, Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:13DETSam GagnerENAssists: Alex Nedeljkovic · Wrist, 0.64 xG3–5
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 13:44BOSMarc McLaughlin: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 17:18BOSCharlie McAvoy: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 1:22DETPius Suter: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:48DETJake Walman: Holding2 min
  5. P2 19:07BOSNick Foligno: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 3:27BOSCharlie McAvoy: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 8:46DETDanny DeKeyser: Interference2 min
  8. P3 11:58DETDanny DeKeyser: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 12:46BOSTaylor Hall: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 16:45BOSBrad Marchand: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 16:45DETDylan Larkin: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 0:00BOSAnton Blidh: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 0:00BOSAnton Blidh: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 0:00BOSDerek Forbort: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 0:00DETMichael Rasmussen: Slashing2 min
  16. P3 0:00DETMichael Rasmussen: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
48% to win52% to win
← BOS attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Rasmussen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSDET
50Shots on goal29
4.5Expected goals3.2
70Shot attempts48
44Faceoffs won29
4Power plays5
34Penalty minutes22
28Hits31
9Blocked shots7
5Giveaways15
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestHaula – Hall – Nosek6:29

    xG 0.57–0.11 (84%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Smith – Coyle4:15

    xG 0.40–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Bergeron – Marchand – DeBrusk8:50

    xG 0.42–0.36 (54%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  4. Smith – Coyle – Hall2:15

    xG 0.38–0.37 (51%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Carlo9:55

    xG 0.98–0.13 (88%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  2. Forbort – Carlo4:32

    xG 0.44–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  3. Grzelcyk – McAvoy4:57

    xG 0.15–0.02 (88%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestSundqvist – Erne – Rasmussen7:22

    xG 0.41–0.28 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Gagner – Veleno – Hirose5:08

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Bertuzzi – Larkin – Raymond10:01

    xG 0.65–0.75 (46%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1

  4. Vrana – Suter – Zadina7:05

    xG 0.19–0.36 (34%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalman – Lindstrom10:29

    xG 0.85–0.45 (66%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

  2. DeKeyser – Seider10:35

    xG 0.44–0.43 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. Staal – Hronek10:03

    xG 0.43–0.52 (45%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 3.2 xGBOS 4.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #336 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 69% of the time.

DET winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).