Sun, Apr 10, 2022·Capital One Arena, Washington
Boston Bruins 2, Washington Capitals 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 72% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 08 | 216 | 06 | 230 |
| WSH | 07 | 211 | 215 | 433 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 4:11WSHJohn CarlsonAssists: Conor Sheary · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
- P2 7:55BOSCurtis LazarAssists: Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.29 xG1–1
- P2 8:55BOSErik HaulaAssists: Charlie McAvoy · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
- P2 14:50WSHTom WilsonAssists: Lars Eller, Anthony Mantha · Snap, 0.38 xG2–2
- P3 7:18WSHLars EllerGWGAssists: Nick Jensen · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–3
- P3 19:58WSHAlex OvechkinENAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.77 xG2–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 11:47WSHNic Dowd: High sticking2 min
- P1 18:13WSHDmitry Orlov: Boarding2 min
- P2 4:46WSHLars Eller: Hooking2 min
- P3 2:55WSHTrevor van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min
- P3 10:43BOSTaylor Hall: Tripping2 min
- P3 15:18BOSTrent Frederic: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Eller won the faceoff against Coyle
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestFoligno – Lazar – Nosek8:56
xG 1.05–0.18 (85%)attempts 16–6goals 1–1
- Bergeron – Marchand – DeBrusk10:32
xG 0.76–0.80 (49%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1
- Smith – Coyle – Frederic7:59
xG 0.33–0.61 (35%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0
- Haula – Hall – McLaughlin9:08
xG 0.24–0.56 (30%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1
Defence pairs
- bestReilly – McAvoy5:50
xG 1.33–0.26 (84%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0
- Brown – McAvoy3:12
xG 0.59–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0
- Reilly – Brown7:06
xG 0.35–0.28 (56%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0
Washington Capitals
Forward lines
- bestEller – Wilson – Mantha7:28
xG 1.02–0.11 (90%)attempts 12–2goals 2–0
- Dowd – Larsson – Hathaway8:53
xG 0.36–0.26 (57%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0
- Oshie – Johansson – McMichael9:24
xG 0.31–0.74 (29%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1
- Ovechkin – Kuznetsov – Sheary11:54
xG 0.75–1.35 (36%)attempts 14–21goals 1–1
Defence pairs
- bestOrlov – Jensen12:28
xG 1.43–0.32 (82%)attempts 18–8goals 2–0
- Carlson – Fehérváry15:55
xG 0.46–0.73 (39%)attempts 15–18goals 1–1
- Schultz – van Riemsdyk10:42
xG 0.49–0.75 (39%)attempts 8–18goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 72% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (WSH − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).