Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 14, 2022·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Arizona Coyotes 1, Vancouver Canucks 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 69% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI081707122
VAN21041215727

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:18VANAlex ChiassonAssists: J.T. Miller, Quinn Hughes · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:00VANSheldon DriesPPGWGAssists: Brad Hunt, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:29VANElias PetterssonPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, J.T. Miller · Slap, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:38ARIAndrew LaddPPAssists: Phil Kessel, J.J. Moser · Snap, 0.57 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:25VANVasily PodkolzinPPAssists: J.T. Miller, Quinn Hughes · Backhand, 0.18 xG1–4
  6. P2 15:39VANConor GarlandAssists: Vasily Podkolzin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P2 19:33VANVasily PodkolzinAssists: J.T. Miller · Snap, 0.11 xG1–6
  8. P3 8:26VANAlex ChiassonAssists: J.T. Miller, Tyler Myers · Snap, 0.09 xG1–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:41ARITravis Boyd: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:09ARIJ.J. Moser: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 3:56ARIBarrett Hayton: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P2 8:38VANQuinn Hughes: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 13:52ARIKyle Capobianco: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 6:14VANConor Garland: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
48% to win52% to win
← ARI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lammikko won the faceoff against Beagle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIVAN
22Shots on goal27
2.5Expected goals3.6
50Shot attempts52
26Faceoffs won29
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
21Hits25
12Blocked shots18
11Giveaways7
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyd – Carcone – Smith11:01

    xG 0.27–0.20 (58%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  2. Eriksson – Ladd – Kessel8:51

    xG 0.51–0.57 (47%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  3. Schmaltz – Hayton – Maccelli12:15

    xG 0.48–0.65 (42%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  4. Beagle – Ritchie – McBain8:36

    xG 0.08–0.57 (13%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Capobianco – Kolyachonok13:49

    xG 0.14–0.38 (27%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  2. Stralman – Moser15:42

    xG 0.60–0.91 (40%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Mayo14:54

    xG 0.51–0.84 (38%)attempts 17–16goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestDickinson – Lammikko – Lockwood10:23

    xG 0.53–0.14 (79%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Garland – Pettersson – Dries5:12

    xG 0.37–0.19 (66%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Chiasson – Miller – Podkolzin8:54

    xG 0.23–0.07 (77%)attempts 6–5goals 2–0

  4. Horvat – Garland – Pettersson3:49

    xG 0.23–0.17 (57%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Ekman-Larsson9:59

    xG 0.77–0.23 (77%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  2. Schenn – Hughes10:51

    xG 0.62–0.34 (65%)attempts 6–8goals 2–0

  3. Hunt – Burroughs4:05

    xG 0.33–0.14 (71%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.6 xGARI 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #1044 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.70 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 69% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).