Mon, Apr 25, 2022·United Center, Chicago
Philadelphia Flyers 1, Chicago Blackhawks 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 114 | 07 | 013 | 134 |
| CHI | 213 | 09 | 111 | 333 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 1:44CHIErik GustafssonAssists: Jonathan Toews, Dominik Kubalik · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
- P1 6:15CHIJonathan ToewsGWGAssists: Sam Lafferty · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–2
- P1 8:03PHIKevin HayesAssists: Scott Laughton, Travis Konecny · Slap, 0.23 xG1–2
- P3 7:45CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Patrick Kane, Jake McCabe · Slap, 0.08 xG1–3
Penalties (11)
- P1 4:08CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min
- P1 10:23PHITravis Sanheim: Cross checking2 min
- P1 14:26CHISam Lafferty: Interference2 min
- P2 5:53CHIErik Gustafsson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- P2 16:16PHIScott Laughton: Slashing2 min
- P2 19:02PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Hooking2 min
- P3 3:09PHIRonnie Attard: Hooking2 min
- P3 10:51PHIKevin Hayes: Tripping2 min
- P3 18:37CHIJake McCabe: Tripping2 min
- P3 19:09CHISam Lafferty: Roughing2 min
- P3 19:09PHIJoel Farabee: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Thompson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestHayes – Laughton – Konecny2:50
xG 0.49–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0
- van Riemsdyk – Laughton – Brink4:30
xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Hayes – Konecny – Farabee5:38
xG 0.40–0.37 (51%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1
- Thompson – Lindblom – MacEwen8:02
xG 0.05–0.11 (30%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestProvorov – Attard12:24
xG 0.66–0.54 (55%)attempts 18–8goals 0–1
- Yandle – Zamula10:00
xG 0.44–0.53 (45%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0
- Sanheim – Provorov2:01
xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestKane – Strome – DeBrincat10:41
xG 0.24–0.01 (94%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0
- Katchouk – Borgstrom – Johnson6:01
xG 0.28–0.06 (82%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
- Toews – Johnson – Kubalik10:33
xG 0.63–0.58 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0
- Lafferty – Raddysh – Kurashev6:39
xG 0.49–0.64 (44%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestJones – Vlasic9:57
xG 0.65–0.26 (71%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0
- McCabe – Regula14:12
xG 0.54–0.44 (55%)attempts 6–19goals 1–0
- Gustafsson – Vlasic2:16
xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).