Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 17, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 6, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL210118310638
MIN111116112339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:30COLBen MeyersAssists: Erik Johnson, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:14MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Calen Addison, Tyson Jost · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:08COLSamuel GirardAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Valeri Nichushkin · Backhand, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:09MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Calen Addison, Matt Boldy · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:59COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Backhand, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:02COLJosh MansonGWGAssists: Andrew Cogliano, J.T. Compher · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 4:17MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Calen Addison, Mats Zuccarello · Deflected, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:54COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Cale Makar, Valeri Nichushkin · Tip-in, 0.09 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:39COLValeri NichushkinENUnassisted · Snap, 0.52 xG6–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P2 5:04COLMikko Rantanen: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P2 8:37MINMarcus Foligno: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 11:27COLLogan O'Connor: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 11:27MINRyan Hartman: Interference2 min
  5. P2 17:07COLEvan Rodrigues: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 3:22COLKurtis MacDermid: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:23MINBrandon Duhaime: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 5:23COLJosh Manson: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:02MINMason Shaw: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 7:02COLSamuel Girard: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 14:12MINJoel Eriksson Ek: High sticking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 18:44COLArtturi Lehkonen: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
38Shots on goal39
3.4Expected goals2.6
59Shot attempts67
26Faceoffs won32
2Power plays4
14Penalty minutes10
23Hits20
17Blocked shots11
6Giveaways5
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNichushkin – Rodrigues – Newhook9:30

    xG 0.67–0.17 (79%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Cogliano – Compher – O'Connor9:08

    xG 0.52–0.10 (84%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Sedlak – MacDermid – Meyers4:24

    xG 0.24–0.11 (69%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  4. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:12

    xG 0.45–0.77 (37%)attempts 16–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Girard8:50

    xG 0.78–0.12 (87%)attempts 14–5goals 2–0

  2. Manson – Byram10:41

    xG 0.48–0.26 (65%)attempts 8–16goals 1–0

  3. Toews – Makar12:51

    xG 0.30–0.14 (68%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Hartman – Eriksson Ek10:49

    xG 0.70–0.28 (71%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Duhaime – Shaw – Dewar4:34

    xG 0.16–0.12 (56%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Hartman – Jost2:01

    xG 0.02–0.20 (8%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Jost10:05

    xG 0.06–0.62 (9%)attempts 9–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Middleton17:07

    xG 0.42–0.82 (34%)attempts 12–21goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Addison11:05

    xG 0.13–0.61 (17%)attempts 13–13goals 0–2

  3. Brodin – Dumba14:21

    xG 0.50–1.08 (32%)attempts 18–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGCOL 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #340 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.66 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).