Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 12, 2022·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Ottawa Senators 4, Philadelphia Flyers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 51% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT1918210427
PHI11701308138

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:05PHIKevin HayesAssists: Travis Konecny, Joel Farabee · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:28OTTThomas ChabotAssists: Claude Giroux, Brady Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:11OTTAlex DeBrincatPPGWGAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Tim Stützle · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:52OTTAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Derick Brassard, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P3 16:06OTTTim StützleENAssists: Brady Tkachuk, Claude Giroux · Backhand, 0.75 xG4–1
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 11:06OTTJacob Bernard-Docker: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 11:06PHITravis Konecny: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:52OTTMark Kastelic: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 13:52PHITony DeAngelo: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 15:39OTTClaude Giroux: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 4:16OTTJacob Bernard-Docker: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 9:02OTTMathieu Joseph: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 18:16PHINicolas Deslauriers: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P2 19:37PHIJoel Farabee: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 5:10PHIScott Laughton: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
49% to win51% to win
← OTT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stützle won the faceoff against Hayes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPHI
27Shots on goal38
2.6Expected goals2.6
48Shot attempts59
26Faceoffs won32
3Power plays3
16Penalty minutes16
38Hits59
14Blocked shots14
10Giveaways9
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Watson – Kastelic – Kelly5:52

    xG 0.04–0.18 (20%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. DeBrincat – Batherson – Pinto11:09

    xG 0.23–0.37 (38%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Brassard – Motte – Joseph7:44

    xG 0.11–0.31 (26%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Tkachuk – Stützle14:06

    xG 0.37–0.79 (32%)attempts 14–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Chabot2:33

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Brannstrom – Bernard-Docker3:42

    xG 0.00–0.06 (5%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Chabot – Sanderson2:10

    xG 0.07–0.16 (30%)attempts 1–3goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Allison – Tippett3:49

    xG 0.65–0.05 (93%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Hayes – Konecny – Farabee9:59

    xG 0.48–0.29 (62%)attempts 11–14goals 1–0

  3. Sedlak – MacEwen – Cates6:53

    xG 0.15–0.04 (79%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Konecny – Tippett2:15

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Sanheim11:26

    xG 0.69–0.12 (86%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  2. Seeler – Ristolainen11:29

    xG 0.58–0.14 (81%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. DeAngelo – Provorov13:40

    xG 0.45–0.19 (71%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.6 xGOTT 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 36/100 · #913 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.21 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 51% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).