Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 25, 2022·Honda Center, Anaheim

Ottawa Senators 5, Anaheim Ducks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT2721818533
ANA01308111132

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:24OTTBrady TkachukPPAssists: Drake Batherson, Thomas Chabot · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:19OTTDerick BrassardGWGAssists: Mathieu Joseph, Jake Sanderson · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 10:29OTTTim StützlePPAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Drake Batherson · Snap, 0.13 xG3–0
  4. P2 14:54OTTArtem ZubAssists: Derick Brassard, Mathieu Joseph · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–0
  5. P3 6:49OTTMathieu JosephPPAssists: Derick Brassard, Shane Pinto · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–0
  6. P3 17:10ANAMax JonesAssists: Colton White, Nathan Beaulieu · Tip-in, 0.14 xG5–1
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 1:09OTTTim Stützle: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 10:44OTTLassi Thomson: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:25ANARyan Strome: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:54OTTTravis Hamonic: Interference2 min
  5. P2 5:20ANAFrank Vatrano: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 10:15ANAColton White: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:15ANAMason McTavish: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 18:53ANAMason McTavish: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 19:51ANARyan Strome: Cross checking2 min
  10. P2 19:51ANARyan Strome: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 19:51OTTBrady Tkachuk: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 2:45OTTLassi Thomson: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 5:35ANASam Carrick: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  14. P3 14:17OTTBrady Tkachuk: Holding2 min
  15. P3 17:10OTTBrady Tkachuk: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  16. P3 18:19ANAMax Jones: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
49% to win51% to win
← OTT attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Zegras
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTANA
33Shots on goal32
4.0Expected goals3.2
67Shot attempts60
40Faceoffs won31
8Power plays6
17Penalty minutes21
11Hits15
17Blocked shots17
12Giveaways8
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestBrassard – Motte – Joseph7:11

    xG 0.38–0.23 (62%)attempts 9–5goals 2–1

  2. DeBrincat – Batherson – Pinto6:45

    xG 0.29–0.18 (62%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Tkachuk – Stützle6:42

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  4. Watson – Gambrell – Kelly7:21

    xG 0.11–0.57 (16%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – Sanderson10:04

    xG 0.73–0.32 (70%)attempts 17–12goals 0–0

  2. Chabot – Zub13:15

    xG 0.32–0.35 (47%)attempts 15–6goals 1–0

  3. Brannstrom – Thomson8:16

    xG 0.02–0.30 (7%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestCarrick – Lundeström – Regenda5:14

    xG 0.44–0.05 (90%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Silfverberg – Strome – Vatrano5:24

    xG 0.00–0.03 (13%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Terry – Zegras7:43

    xG 0.41–0.52 (44%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Leason – McTavish6:32

    xG 0.16–0.44 (27%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Beaulieu8:50

    xG 0.46–0.35 (57%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – White2:17

    xG 0.03–0.12 (22%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. White – Benoit8:46

    xG 0.24–0.35 (41%)attempts 3–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.2 xGOTT 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #1152 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.79 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).