Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 27, 2022·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Arizona Coyotes 3, Minnesota Wild 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 78% of the time.

MIN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI0518210323
MIN11111028429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:08MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Snap, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:01MINSam SteelAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.28 xG0–2
  3. P2 18:36ARINick SchmaltzAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Clayton Keller · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 0:36MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Jake Middleton, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:33MINMatt BoldyPPGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Calen Addison · Snap, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 16:42ARILawson CrouseAssists: Matias Maccelli · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:12ARIJ.J. MoserAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Matias Maccelli · Snap, 0.15 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 13:32ARIJack McBain: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 1:44MINMarcus Foligno: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P2 1:44MINMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 1:44MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 1:44ARILiam O'Brien: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 1:44MINMarcus Foligno: Misconduct10 min
  7. P2 3:36ARITravis Boyd: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 9:40ARILiam O'Brien: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 5:42ARIClayton Keller: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
49% to win51% to win
← ARI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaudreau won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIMIN
23Shots on goal29
1.5Expected goals3.0
41Shot attempts55
26Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes19
14Hits22
17Blocked shots9
7Giveaways2
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyd – Schmaltz – Keller13:49

    xG 0.26–0.19 (57%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  2. Bjugstad – Crouse – Maccelli8:54

    xG 0.32–0.30 (52%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. O'Brien – Fischer – McBain6:39

    xG 0.22–0.20 (52%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Kassian – Ritchie – Hayton8:15

    xG 0.09–0.70 (11%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Chychrun18:39

    xG 0.65–0.55 (54%)attempts 17–17goals 1–1

  2. Nemeth – Stecher11:04

    xG 0.26–0.31 (45%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Välimäki – Moser14:37

    xG 0.18–0.37 (33%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKaprizov – Shaw – Dewar2:08

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Reaves – Foligno – Eriksson Ek7:12

    xG 0.34–0.06 (84%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Gaudreau – Greenway – Boldy8:20

    xG 0.22–0.19 (54%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Steel12:55

    xG 0.32–0.30 (51%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba13:16

    xG 0.82–0.34 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Merrill – Addison6:11

    xG 0.38–0.10 (79%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Middleton10:39

    xG 0.24–0.20 (54%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.0 xGARI 1.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #474 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 78% of the time.

MIN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).