Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 13, 2022·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Anaheim Ducks 0, Toronto Maple Leafs 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 87% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0160606028
TOR214217311742

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:58TORAlexander KerfootGWGAssists: Pierre Engvall, Conor Timmins · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:41TORJohn TavaresAssists: Mitch Marner, Conor Timmins · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:16TORTJ BrodieAssists: Conor Timmins, Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–3
  4. P2 16:33TORMichael BuntingAssists: John Tavares, Mitch Marner · Backhand, 0.20 xG0–4
  5. P3 2:37TORAlexander KerfootAssists: Mark Giordano, Pontus Holmberg · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–5
  6. P3 5:42TORPierre EngvallAssists: Rasmus Sandin, Pontus Holmberg · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–6
  7. P3 18:20TORJoey AndersonAssists: Pontus Holmberg, Rasmus Sandin · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:13TORRasmus Sandin: Interference2 min
  2. P1 19:48ANAMason McTavish: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 3:47ANADmitry Kulikov: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 8:45ANANathan Beaulieu: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 18:51TORDavid Kampf: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 18:51ANATrevor Zegras: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
49% to win51% to win
← ANA attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Tavares won the faceoff against Henrique
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATOR
28Shots on goal42
2.0Expected goals4.6
42Shot attempts72
27Faceoffs won37
1Power plays3
8Penalty minutes4
35Hits15
14Blocked shots2
7Giveaways6
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestLeason – Zegras – McTavish2:58

    xG 0.57–0.15 (79%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Comtois – Leason – McTavish5:19

    xG 0.45–0.31 (59%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Strome – Terry – Zegras2:56

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Silfverberg – Zegras2:52

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Klingberg2:48

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Klingberg – Beaulieu7:47

    xG 0.82–0.75 (52%)attempts 8–12goals 0–3

  3. Shattenkirk – White2:20

    xG 0.04–0.02 (69%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestNylander – Bunting – Matthews9:50

    xG 1.22–0.53 (70%)attempts 20–8goals 1–0

  2. Anderson – Aston-Reese – Holmberg9:59

    xG 0.31–0.03 (91%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  3. Kerfoot – Engvall – Kampf12:29

    xG 0.52–0.58 (47%)attempts 11–15goals 2–0

  4. Tavares – Marner – Malgin8:05

    xG 0.47–0.58 (45%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Timmins14:11

    xG 0.81–0.40 (67%)attempts 12–9goals 2–0

  2. Liljegren – Sandin14:09

    xG 0.87–0.49 (64%)attempts 20–9goals 2–0

  3. Giordano – Holl14:55

    xG 0.74–0.67 (53%)attempts 17–11goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 4.6 xGANA 2.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 6/100 · #1275 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 87% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).