Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 13, 2022·United Center, Chicago

Washington Capitals 7, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 56% of the time.

CHI winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH21121039730
CHI1911515329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:24WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: John Carlson, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:14WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Conor Sheary, Sonny Milano · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:00CHITyler JohnsonAssists: Jake McCabe, Jujhar Khaira · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:56WSHTrevor van RiemsdykAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 11:38CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Taylor Raddysh · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:18WSHNic DowdGWGAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Nicolas Aube-Kubel · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 6:34WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Anthony Mantha, Evgeny Kuznetsov · Wrist, 0.24 xG5–2
  8. P3 8:59WSHAnthony ManthaAssists: Nick Jensen · Snap, 0.10 xG6–2
  9. P3 18:51CHIMax DomiAssists: Ian Mitchell, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.13 xG6–3
  10. P3 19:24WSHDmitry OrlovAssists: Nicolas Aube-Kubel, Garnet Hathaway · Slap, 0.02 xG7–3
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 6:19CHISam Lafferty: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:58WSHEvgeny Kuznetsov: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 10:37WSHNicolas Aube-Kubel: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P3 13:49WSHJohn Carlson: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
49% to win51% to win
← WSH attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHCHI
30Shots on goal29
3.0Expected goals3.3
66Shot attempts54
16Faceoffs won25
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
16Hits25
14Blocked shots21
7Giveaways7
11Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestDowd – Hathaway – Aube-Kubel9:29

    xG 0.85–0.28 (75%)attempts 17–8goals 2–0

  2. Kuznetsov – Mantha – Milano7:34

    xG 0.26–0.09 (75%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  3. Johansson – Mantha – Protas3:11

    xG 0.11–0.04 (72%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Sheary – Strome11:31

    xG 0.62–0.69 (47%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Gustafsson11:07

    xG 0.50–0.08 (87%)attempts 15–5goals 1–0

  2. Carlson – Orlov3:36

    xG 0.22–0.00 (99%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Orlov – Jensen15:02

    xG 0.38–0.40 (49%)attempts 16–11goals 2–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. Khaira – Dickinson – Lafferty2:32

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Khaira – Dickinson9:43

    xG 0.17–0.18 (48%)attempts 4–7goals 1–1

  3. Toews – Raddysh – Kurashev12:00

    xG 0.45–0.51 (47%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  4. Blackwell – Entwistle – Johnson5:52

    xG 0.06–0.17 (25%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Mitchell8:50

    xG 0.59–0.39 (60%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

  2. Tinordi – Mitchell6:32

    xG 0.19–0.15 (55%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

  3. McCabe – Jones6:48

    xG 0.36–0.33 (52%)attempts 4–6goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGWSH 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #504 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.27 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 56% of the time.

CHI winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).