Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 17, 2022·Mullett Arena, Tempe

Buffalo Sabres 5, Arizona Coyotes 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 83% of the time.

ARI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF113112318543
ARI1711509231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:35ARIShayne GostisbeherePPAssists: Jakob Chychrun, Nick Schmaltz · Slap, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:34BUFJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch · Deflected, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:16ARIBarrett HaytonUnassisted · Snap, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:42BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Tage Thompson · Snap, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:07BUFTage ThompsonPPGWGAssists: Alex Tuch, Rasmus Dahlin · Slap, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:32BUFTyson JostENAssists: Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.47 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:08BUFKyle OkposoENAssists: Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.73 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:44BUFKale Clague: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:33ARIJack McBain: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 7:59ARIJan Jenik: Holding2 min
  4. P1 9:20BUFPeyton Krebs: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P1 12:47BUFJeremy Davies: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 17:33ARILawson Crouse: Interference2 min
  7. P2 6:17ARIJan Jenik: Interference2 min
  8. P2 17:37BUFKyle Okposo: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 18:46BUFRasmus Dahlin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 9:15ARINick Bjugstad: Holding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 10:57BUFKale Clague: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFARI
43Shots on goal31
5.7Expected goals3.1
65Shot attempts54
28Faceoffs won31
5Power plays6
12Penalty minutes10
17Hits28
13Blocked shots14
5Giveaways15
10Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Tuch – Thompson9:15

    xG 0.76–0.20 (80%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Cozens – Quinn – Peterka6:04

    xG 0.23–0.25 (48%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  3. Olofsson – Jost – Mittelstadt8:10

    xG 0.27–0.34 (44%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs10:21

    xG 0.29–0.48 (38%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClague – Dahlin9:52

    xG 0.38–0.13 (74%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Samuelsson – Dahlin3:01

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Clague – Fitzgerald2:18

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Crouse – Maccelli9:29

    xG 0.52–0.24 (68%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  2. Fischer – Hayton – McBain2:40

    xG 0.26–0.15 (63%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Ritchie – Fischer – Hayton3:18

    xG 0.14–0.11 (57%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  4. Ritchie – Fischer – McBain3:31

    xG 0.09–0.10 (50%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Chychrun14:57

    xG 0.61–0.22 (73%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Nemeth – Stecher6:58

    xG 0.39–0.23 (63%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Stecher – Välimäki3:03

    xG 0.25–0.19 (57%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.1 xGBUF 5.7 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #406 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 83% of the time.

ARI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).